In Reply to: It truly is a worthless post.... posted by uw312@aol.com on February 13, 2005 at 08:29:08:
Dear uw312,You said:
>>...anytime someone decides to bash Monster, Ray has to be right there chearleading and playing the poor, helpless victim.<<
"anytime" Hardly true, check *just* the threads on the AA, virtually all the MC discussion I have had has been on AA.
"cheerleading" I don't do poms poms, never have.
"poor, helpless victim" Nope, incorrect. Victim's advocate maybe.
You said:
>>how unfair, unethical and aggressive Bose's business practices are<<
Please give some details of how Bose and Monster Cable are either the same or different in regards to "unfair", "unethical", and/or "aggressive". Since Monster Cable's tactics have been compared to Bose's more than once that would be a valid and relevant audio industry related discussion. *IF* Bose is as bad as MC and *IF* someone had reined them in, then maybe MC wouldn't have been operating under tacit approval.
Do you approve of Monster Cable's tactics?
You said:
>>...let's make it truly "back-channel" and off the boards...<<<
And I would have left it back-channel, if it would have succeeded. It became a relevant post IMO due to the failure caused by Dave Tognotti's phone call.
You said:
>>...and spare us the progress reports...<<
You are cordially invited to ignore my postings. The posts are read by many who have made no reply posts at all. I have heard from some of these folks and they are grateful for the information and discussion, along with being supportive of my doing so.
Ray
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: It truly is a worthless post.... - Ray Kimber 09:55:05 02/13/05 (0)