Home General Asylum

General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories.

Re: Hey...Srajan...it links to your page for the review! And it's an implied rave!

65.121.117.135

Conspiracy alert!

Adam Dragon has indeed linked to the introductory page submitted for fact checking. I just found it. That's highly unusual and wasn't authorized.

Implied rave? Whoa. Conspiracy theory running at an all-time high? All I know thus far is that the amp performed stunningly well into my hornspeakers until it developed the distortion that had me send it back. I just killed the hidden URL and will contact Adam to find out what he was thinking - or not thinking.

As far as being shocked? By all means feel that way. Submitting advance copy for fact checking is standard protocol. As I explained earlier, I like to do it before I get to the actual performance descriptions so I don't have to rely on a fact-check sign off when I'm ready to publish. The manufacturer, for whatever reason, might be slow responding (some take vacations). When you're more or less the only content provider keen on regular updates, conserving time to get on to the next project is important.

What *is* completely non-standard? To send readers to a review that hasn't developed past the intro and says nothing about how the unit sounds like. This hasn't happened before and I'm not sure why Adam did it.

Cheers,

Srajan


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Michael Percy Audio  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.