In Reply to: "if they charactize something as 'the best I've heard at the price' that statement means a lot...." posted by doesnt_suit_me on June 11, 2002 at 17:37:09:
As a long-time reader of Stereophile, TAS and (when they were published) Stereo Review, High Fidelity and Audio, I can tell you that a careful read of most of their reviews (the qualification "most" applies to SR and HF) will get you an idea of what the reviewer thinks of the product. And the "best I've heard" statement is not found in every review, even in SR, which was the least critical of the bunch.OTOH, if you have no truck with subtlety, i.e. your idea of a "tough" review is for the reviewer to say "This sucks, man!" you probably will be disappointed. I get the feeling that is the real root of the problem the seems to bother lots of the conspiracy theorists lurking here and elsewhere.
I assume, of course, that these whiners dutifully subscribe to all of the ad-free audio mags (and to Consumer Reports for good measure) so they can get their information unpolluted by those nasty people who make the equipment they want to buy.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: "if they charactize something as 'the best I've heard at the price' that statement means a lot.. - Bruce from DC 07:33:19 06/12/02 (9)
- more on "negativity", which I consider critical thinking - doesnt_suit_me 16:57:01 06/12/02 (3)
- Re: more on "negativity", which I consider critical thinking - Bruce from DC 10:35:46 06/13/02 (2)
- You wrote: - Kal Rubinson 11:52:49 06/13/02 (1)
- Re: Sure, Kal - Bruce from DC 14:18:22 06/13/02 (0)
- Re: "if they charactize something as 'the best I've heard at the price' that statement means a lot.. - Charles Hansen 09:48:16 06/12/02 (4)
- Since we're not pulling any punches.................... - Chris Garrett 12:22:06 06/12/02 (2)
- Re: Since we're not pulling any punches.................... - Charles Hansen 21:31:00 06/12/02 (1)
- I give up.................. - Chris Garrett 09:31:56 06/13/02 (0)
- Re: ""nasty people" etc. - Bruce from DC 10:40:11 06/12/02 (0)