Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - TAS, Stereophile Ad Practices and other issues - hexenboden 14:09:44 06/11/02 (46)

• Re: TAS, Stereophile Ad Practices and other issues - Ralph 10:37:58 06/12/02 (0)
• Re: TAS, Stereophile Ad Practices and other issues - Char 20:12:45 06/11/02 (0)
• you are so naive ... - porky_pig_jr 18:07:44 06/11/02 (2)
• I hope I stay that way (nt) - hexenboden 06:51:25 06/12/02 (0)
• Well spoken, Pig. (nt) - SalD 00:12:44 06/12/02 (0)
• TAS won't unsub you from their mailing list - what more do you need to know? (nt) - doesnt_suit_me 17:26:56 06/11/02 (0)
• I agree with you about how TAS has changed (nt) - GPB 17:15:55 06/11/02 (1)
• I don't - Dave Pogue 17:50:49 06/11/02 (0)
• Advertising is EVERYTHING to magazines - Guy de Sac 14:46:27 06/11/02 (0)
• Unfortunately... - Budrew 14:33:30 06/11/02 (5)
• Re: Unfortunately... - Charles Hansen 16:16:55 06/11/02 (4)
• So, is it the manufacturers... - Budrew 17:11:44 06/11/02 (2)
• Re: So, is it the manufacturers... - John Atkinson 11:06:36 06/12/02 (0)
• Re: So, is it the manufacturers... - Charles Hansen 19:19:37 06/11/02 (0)
• Re: Unfortunately... - Doug Schneider 16:23:14 06/11/02 (0)
• It's SOP - sjb 14:32:34 06/11/02 (0)
• A reviewer`s opinion is no more valid than your`s or mine - they`re guides, not gospel.[nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 14:23:30 06/11/02 (29)
• To elaborate a little then...... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 15:18:26 06/12/02 (4)
• Re: To elaborate a little then...... - Rob Doorack 08:53:00 06/13/02 (3)
• Re: To elaborate a little then...... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:38:15 06/13/02 (2)
• Re: reviewers' equipment lists in Stereophile - Rob Doorack 10:54:13 06/13/02 (1)
• Re: reviewers' equipment lists in Stereophile - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 11:13:10 06/13/02 (0)
• Re: A reviewer`s opinion is no more valid than your`s or mine - they`re guides, not gospel.[nt] - Bruce from DC 15:59:26 06/11/02 (17)
• Re: A reviewer`s opinion is no more valid than your`s or mine - they`re guides, not gospel.[nt] - Robert H. 18:32:55 06/11/02 (5)
• Re: A reviewer`s opinion is no more valid than your`s or mine - they`re guides, not gospel.[nt] - John Atkinson 11:22:56 06/12/02 (0)
• Re: A reviewer`s opinion is no more valid than your`s or mine - they`re guides, not gospel.[nt] - Kal Rubinson 19:47:15 06/11/02 (2)
• Re: A reviewer`s opinion is no more valid than your`s or mine - they`re guides, not gospel.[nt] - John Atkinson 07:39:12 06/13/02 (1)
• Re: A reviewer`s opinion is no more valid than your`s or mine - they`re guides, not gospel.[nt] - Robert H. 14:15:08 06/13/02 (0)
• Re: A reviewer`s opinion is no more valid than your`s or mine - they`re guides, not gospel.[nt] - Charles Hansen 19:24:08 06/11/02 (0)
• "if they charactize something as 'the best I've heard at the price' that statement means a lot...." - doesnt_suit_me 17:37:09 06/11/02 (10)
• Re: "if they charactize something as 'the best I've heard at the price' that statement means a lot.. - Bruce from DC 07:33:19 06/12/02 (9)
• more on "negativity", which I consider critical thinking - doesnt_suit_me 16:57:01 06/12/02 (3)
• Re: more on "negativity", which I consider critical thinking - Bruce from DC 10:35:46 06/13/02 (2)
• You wrote: - Kal Rubinson 11:52:49 06/13/02 (1)
• Re: Sure, Kal - Bruce from DC 14:18:22 06/13/02 (0)
• Re: "if they charactize something as 'the best I've heard at the price' that statement means a lot.. - Charles Hansen 09:48:16 06/12/02 (4)
• Since we're not pulling any punches.................... - Chris Garrett 12:22:06 06/12/02 (2)
• Re: Since we're not pulling any punches.................... - Charles Hansen 21:31:00 06/12/02 (1)
• I give up.................. - Chris Garrett 09:31:56 06/13/02 (0)
• Re: ""nasty people" etc. - Bruce from DC 10:40:11 06/12/02 (0)
• That's dogma, not reality - John Marks 15:16:35 06/11/02 (5)
• Re: That's dogma, not reality - Timbo in Oz 23:02:28 06/11/02 (0)
• Pssst: it's 'Robert' Parker - hexenboden 15:42:29 06/11/02 (3)
• Refill!!!!! - John Marks 16:08:19 06/11/02 (2)
• Re: Refill!!!!! - Charles Hansen 16:18:54 06/11/02 (1)
• Re: RObert Parker - Refill!!!!! - Timbo in Oz 23:22:38 06/11/02 (0)

Follow Ups

• Re: A reviewer`s opinion is no more valid than your`s or mine - they`re guides, not gospel.[nt] - Kal Rubinson 19:47:15 06/11/02 (2)
• Re: A reviewer`s opinion is no more valid than your`s or mine - they`re guides, not gospel.[nt] - John Atkinson 07:39:12 06/13/02 (1)
• Re: A reviewer`s opinion is no more valid than your`s or mine - they`re guides, not gospel.[nt] - Robert H. 14:15:08 06/13/02 (0)