|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: RE: CS4398: extreme opposite of the large tap length Chord DAC? posted by Tony Lauck on November 21, 2015 at 12:09:33:
[There is no definition of "objectively perfect" that can be applied to a DAC. This is a technical characteristic of the format...]
Tony, I'm not sure what you refer to by that declaration. At any rate, what I wrote was "objectively the better", not objectively perfect. I read you to be a technically educated person, so, is there really any question that the closer a band limited digital audio signal's reconstruction filter approaches an ideal sinc function at Nyquist, the objectively better it is, all else being equal (quantization noise floor, band ripple, etc.)?Whether or not it's subjectively the better is a different question.
_
Ken Newton
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: CS4398: extreme opposite of the large tap length Chord DAC? - knewton 15:55:19 11/21/15 (2)
- RE: CS4398: extreme opposite of the large tap length Chord DAC? - Tony Lauck 18:28:03 11/21/15 (1)
- RE: CS4398: extreme opposite of the large tap length Chord DAC? - fmak 22:03:32 11/26/15 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
