In Reply to: I personally have no hypothesis ... posted by Feanor on November 6, 2015 at 07:39:42:
Do tubes add this sense of depth, or allow it through unmolested? Nothing personal to you, of course, but I find it curious that a sonic presentation that sounds more real (perception of depth) should be considered inconvenient somehow, or the effect of a mistake (microphony).
Maybe tubes are better transcriptors of sonic fields than other amplifying devices, owing to their relative simplicity. Or not. But I'm on the side of the debate that resists the notion that because it is 'old tech', for that reason it is 'bad tech'. Books are old tech, but work very well for the purpose for which they were designed!
This is distinct from the ringing effects in digital, which seems to add a kind of 'false reverberation' or smearing effect on signals.
Big J
"... only a very few individuals understand as yet that personal salvation is a contradiction in terms."
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Depth - jusbe 14:57:20 11/06/15 (10)
- Old or new tech isn't the issue - Feanor 20:16:39 11/06/15 (9)
- RE: Old or new tech isn't the issue - morricab 07:52:40 11/10/15 (0)
- " I mean accuracy to the recording as it exists on the media I'm playing" - Ivan303 19:31:01 11/07/15 (6)
- That's a good question, nevertheless accuracy to the recorded media is my goal - Feanor 05:00:08 11/08/15 (5)
- Laudable goal.... - Ivan303 07:29:36 11/08/15 (3)
- As I've pointed out before, there's no such thing as "live sound" ... - Feanor 09:15:49 11/08/15 (2)
- RE: As I've pointed out before, there's no such thing as "live sound" ... - morricab 07:20:42 11/10/15 (0)
- RE: As I've pointed out before, there's no such thing as "live sound" ... - Ivan303 13:33:04 11/08/15 (0)
- I think most people agree with your goal - Dave_K 06:47:19 11/08/15 (0)
- Especially when it "improves" everything in the same manner, regardless of whether it needs it or not...nt - kuribo 13:28:00 11/07/15 (0)