engineering vs musicality

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Help- Digital vs Analog (long) - HiFiOd 08:27:25 09/03/15 (76)

Go back to basics - jeromelang 21:30:37 09/05/15 (7)

RE: Go back to basics - flood2 14:34:49 09/10/15 (0)

Are you serious? - rlw 13:44:36 09/08/15 (3)

He could be... - Tony Lauck 08:53:59 09/09/15 (2)

RE: He could be... - flood2 18:47:52 09/09/15 (1)

RE: He could be... - Tony Lauck 19:20:48 09/09/15 (0)

RE: Go back to basics - HiFiOd 11:07:36 09/06/15 (1)

I have the SCD1 - jeromelang 20:55:04 09/06/15 (0)

RE: Help- Digital vs Analog (long) - PAR 06:49:01 09/04/15 (0)

RE: Help- Digital vs Analog (long) - RGA 00:21:30 09/04/15 (0)

Are you comparing just ONE digital recording - jedrider 11:31:19 09/03/15 (47)

Celebidache Bruckner's 8th is a 1999 issue - HiFiOd 15:57:06 09/04/15 (0)

RE: Are you comparing just ONE digital recording - knewton 12:05:00 09/03/15 (2)

RE: Are you comparing just ONE digital recording - Todd Krieger 01:41:32 09/05/15 (0)

RE: Are you comparing just ONE digital recording - Crazy Dave 08:48:20 09/04/15 (0)

Clarification - HiFiOd 12:00:54 09/03/15 (42)

RE: "Vinyl is fo the weekends, but it is a treat." - rick_m 09:57:15 09/04/15 (41)

RE: Information storage and commercail priorities - HiFiOd 10:42:04 09/04/15 (40)

RE: Information storage and commercail priorities - John Elison 14:35:44 09/04/15 (39)

Bravo! - rlw 13:58:11 09/08/15 (0)

The problem is the obsolete CD format, not digital. - Tony Lauck 17:50:13 09/04/15 (37)

RE: The problem is the obsolete CD format, not digital. - JaroTheWise 22:53:06 09/05/15 (4)

RE: The problem is the obsolete CD format, not digital. - Mr_Steady 08:04:39 09/06/15 (3)

RE: The problem is the obsolete CD format, not digital. - JaroTheWise 14:58:39 09/06/15 (2)

RE: The problem is the obsolete CD format, not digital. - Mr_Steady 18:06:03 09/06/15 (1)

RE: The problem is the obsolete CD format, not digital. - JaroTheWise 20:23:47 09/06/15 (0)

RE: The problem is the obsolete CD format, not digital. - Todd Krieger 01:37:54 09/05/15 (18)

RE: The problem is the obsolete CD format, not digital. - Mr_Steady 08:14:38 09/06/15 (0)

engineering vs musicality - HiFiOd 19:55:04 09/05/15 (0)

RE: The problem is the obsolete CD format, not digital. - John Elison 08:08:33 09/05/15 (15)

RE: The problem is the obsolete CD format, not digital. - Todd Krieger 20:03:12 09/05/15 (14)

RE: The problem is the obsolete CD format, not digital. - John Elison 21:41:31 09/05/15 (13)

RE: The problem is the obsolete CD format, not digital. - ahendler 18:33:32 09/07/15 (3)

RE: The problem is the obsolete CD format, not digital. - John Elison 18:55:20 09/07/15 (2)

RE: The problem is the obsolete CD format, not digital. - ahendler 02:17:50 09/08/15 (1)

Well, I've moved on to higher resolution digital formats. - John Elison 02:30:27 09/08/15 (0)

RE: The problem is the obsolete CD format, not digital. - Tony Lauck 07:33:23 09/06/15 (8)

RE: The problem is the obsolete CD format, not digital. - ahendler 18:36:14 09/07/15 (0)

"Claims that a product or process is transparent. . . are suspect" - Chris from Lafayette 10:02:31 09/06/15 (1)

RE: "Claims that a product or process is transparent. . . are suspect" - ahendler 18:40:43 09/07/15 (0)

RE: The problem is the obsolete CD format, not digital. - John Elison 08:48:02 09/06/15 (4)

RF output from DACs is real. - Tony Lauck 10:22:02 09/06/15 (3)

RE: RF output from DACs is real. - ahendler 18:45:43 09/07/15 (0)

RE: RF output from DACs is real. - John Elison 10:53:10 09/06/15 (0)

DAC Design Engineering - HiFiOd 10:52:28 09/06/15 (0)

RE: The problem is the obsolete CD format, not digital. - John Elison 18:17:28 09/04/15 (12)

RE: The problem is the obsolete CD format, not digital. - Todd Krieger 01:28:31 09/05/15 (8)

RE: The problem is the obsolete CD format, not digital. - John Elison 08:54:20 09/05/15 (7)

Framing the issue - HiFiOd 09:29:07 09/05/15 (6)

RE: Framing the issue - Tony Lauck 11:13:24 09/05/15 (5)

RE: Framing the issue - John Elison 12:30:15 09/05/15 (4)

RE: Framing the issue - Tony Lauck 12:46:31 09/05/15 (3)

RE: Framing the issue - John Elison 14:00:01 09/05/15 (2)

RE: Framing the issue - Tony Lauck 14:03:56 09/05/15 (1)

RE: Framing the issue - John Elison 14:06:45 09/05/15 (0)

RE: The problem is the obsolete CD format, not digital. - Tony Lauck 18:29:29 09/04/15 (2)

RE: The problem is the obsolete CD format, not digital. - John Elison 20:09:24 09/04/15 (1)

RE: The problem is the obsolete CD format, not digital. - Tony Lauck 20:33:15 09/04/15 (0)

RE: The recording sounded "dull, flat, dim, not as vivid"? - genungo 10:36:42 09/03/15 (6)

RE: The recording sounded "dull, flat, dim, not as vivid"? - HiFiOd 11:35:37 09/03/15 (5)

Lousy fresh juice vs. good juice from concentrate - genungo 14:51:30 09/03/15 (4)

RE: Lousy fresh juice vs. good juice from concentrate - Tony Lauck 17:41:46 09/04/15 (3)

RE: "35 years old and totally obsolete" - genungo 19:49:40 09/04/15 (2)

RE: "35 years old and totally obsolete" - Tony Lauck 20:50:34 09/04/15 (1)

Right on! (NT) - HiFiOd 19:56:45 09/05/15 (0)

Are you sure you matched levels? [nt] - Chris from Lafayette 09:01:55 09/03/15 (4)

I assume this is a "tongue in cheek" response? - Beef Guinness Cutie Pie 11:00:51 09/03/15 (3)

RE: I assume this is a "tongue in cheek" response? - Tony Lauck 11:48:06 09/04/15 (0)

"Have you ever heard slightly mismatched levels responsible for "dull, flat, dim, 'not as vivid'" sound?" - Chris from Lafayette 08:58:54 09/04/15 (0)

RE: I assume this is a "tongue in cheek" response? - Ivan303 08:09:33 09/04/15 (0)

RE: Help- Digital vs Analog (long) - ahendler 08:42:05 09/03/15 (5)

I agree and prefer dacs that do not oversample or upsample. - garymuffley 13:05:27 09/04/15 (0)

RE: Help- Digital vs Analog (long) - HiFiOd 15:07:12 09/03/15 (3)

RE: Help- Digital vs Analog (long) - Bill Way 19:07:47 09/03/15 (2)

RE: Help- Digital vs Analog (long) - HiFiOd 08:23:59 09/04/15 (1)

RE: Help- Digital vs Analog (long) - Bill Way 09:23:51 09/04/15 (0)

Follow Ups

engineering vs musicality - HiFiOd 19:55:04 09/05/15 (0)

Post a Message!