In Reply to: RE: Wenzel 10M oscillator with 50 ohm SMA(f) as Master Clock posted by Thorsten on July 9, 2015 at 04:41:59:
Hi Thorsten,
Thank you for your response. I started exploring the 10M ultra low phase noise clocks after reading some forums where members are experiencing significant improvement in transient definition and imaging spatiality while using 10M clocks. Here are some links:
http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f6-dac-digital-analog-conversion/mutec-mc-3-a-17300/
http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f10-music-servers/reclocking-19326/
http://www.thinksrs.com/products/PERF10.htm
http://www.antelopeaudio.com/en/products/10M-atomic-clock (I have heard an audio system with this as the master clock and it was one of the best digital systems I have heard. However this clock is very expensive. I came across Wenzel while looking for lower cost and possibly better alternatives)
Some reviewers and forum members are also experiencing significant improvements with re-clocking:
http://www.mutec-net.com/artikel.php?id=1388254422
http://www.aktives-hoeren.de/viewtopic.php?p=68452
http://www.mutec-net.com/downloads/pdf/MUTEC_press_03-2015-1_ED.pdf
Most of these users are using NAD M51 DAC and I am using the same DAC. The NAD M51 DAC has a very good AES-EBU input (much better than its USB input).
I could not find whether connecting a 50 ohm BNC clock output to a 75 ohm WLCK IN cause reflections, thus adding jitter. Hence I posted on this forum. Based on your answer, it looks like I should be fine if I use a 50ohm attenuator near the WCLK IN of Mutec MC-3+.
Thanks,
Satish
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Wenzel 10M oscillator with 50 ohm SMA(f) as Master Clock - bssk 10:36:31 07/10/15 (1)
- RE: Wenzel 10M oscillator with 50 ohm SMA(f) as Master Clock - Thorsten 09:57:40 07/12/15 (0)