In Reply to: RE: "so who cares?" posted by genungo on June 17, 2015 at 11:09:12:
Hi,
> I guess I'm one of the lucky (unlucky?) ones who has never known
> a well-recorded standard CD to sound that much worse than any
> other format.
Good on you. What you miss though is my point about re-mastering. But never mind.
> I still prefer good old vinyl though.
Well, forgive me please for being such a prick.
But if you never known "a well-recorded standard CD to sound that
much worse than any other format."
How could vinyl be preferrable?
Thor
At 20 bits, you are on the verge of dynamic range covering fly-farts-at-20-feet to intolerable pain. Really, what more could we need?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "so who cares?" - Thorsten 13:01:09 06/17/15 (3)
- RE: "Preferrable" vinyl - genungo 13:34:19 06/17/15 (2)
- RE: "Preferrable" vinyl - Tidycat1 20:17:38 06/17/15 (1)
- RE: "Preferrable" vinyl - genungo 21:35:19 06/17/15 (0)