In Reply to: RE: Digital and difference in DACs posted by Todd Krieger on June 8, 2015 at 04:51:14:
Todd,
What you are saying about older CD's is consistent with what I am hearing on my system. I have been very surprised at just how good some of the older CD's sound. Even some that I used as demo disks, before I even owned a CD players, have more information on them than I was able to get off of them with the first few generations of CD players.
I have done some comparison with the latest Stereo remixes of the Beatles to the earlier Parlophone mix CD. Actually, I was doing this because of your posts on these recordings that you made quite a wile ago. They sounded very different to me. The newer mixes had a lot of detail and image specificity (Abbey Road). But the older CDs sounded more blended, like a live performance. I also have the mono box set, but I thought that the stereo would be more even to compare. I could see how someone could prefer either one, and to be honest, I have not decided which one I prefer, but there is an obvious difference.
Dave
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Digital and difference in DACs - Crazy Dave 09:45:35 06/08/15 (9)
- RE: Digital and difference in DACs - Todd Krieger 18:37:17 06/08/15 (7)
- RE: Digital and difference in DACs - Crazy Dave 09:42:12 06/09/15 (6)
- RE: Digital and difference in DACs - Todd Krieger 23:09:09 06/09/15 (5)
- RE: Digital and difference in DACs - Crazy Dave 07:53:46 06/10/15 (4)
- RE: Digital and difference in DACs - Todd Krieger 11:00:54 06/10/15 (3)
- RE: Digital and difference in DACs - flood2 19:07:11 06/10/15 (1)
- RE: Digital and difference in DACs - Todd Krieger 04:16:50 06/11/15 (0)
- RE: Digital and difference in DACs - flood2 19:04:24 06/10/15 (0)
- RE: Digital and difference in DACs - jedrider 10:11:46 06/08/15 (0)