|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
I've been digitizing a bunch of older recordings, from the 1940's and earlier. I select 128 kbps for these, since I can't imagine audiophile considerations applying to recordings that old.
As the recordings get into the 50's and 60's, I start to wonder about a general rule for when to switch to 256 kbps. Any thoughts?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - 128 kbps and recording era - spamblam@hotmail.com 06:56:43 05/28/15 (13)
- MP3 should not be used for music. It is technologically obsolete. - Tony Lauck 19:39:42 05/28/15 (7)
- Well , no one has ever really said that the GP is even actually aware of what SQ is ! - Old SteveA 10:01:36 05/30/15 (0)
- Yes, the music industry has only ever seen high quality - Sordidman 09:37:28 05/29/15 (0)
- RE: MP3 should not be used for music. It is technologically obsolete. - flood2 04:15:54 05/29/15 (0)
- RE: MP3 should not be used for music. It is technologically obsolete. - Todd Krieger 21:01:59 05/28/15 (3)
- I wish - JeffH 07:44:37 05/29/15 (1)
- Similarly - E-Stat 08:41:58 05/29/15 (0)
- At least lossless compressed files can be converted back to uncompressed later -nt - tcell 04:12:54 05/29/15 (0)
- RE: 128 kbps and recording era - Todd Krieger 18:27:20 05/28/15 (0)
- By 1958 - sbrians 12:09:56 05/28/15 (0)
- My golden rule: Always ... - SamA 09:22:50 05/28/15 (0)
- Could be a big mistake - Mike B. 08:31:05 05/28/15 (1)
- No could about it - Awe-d-o-file 09:18:25 05/28/15 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
