In Reply to: RE: About depth of field with digital posted by beppe61 on May 10, 2015 at 00:54:44:
Hi,
Yes, it is the one in the pic. It is great music and a great recording, these two often do not get hand in hand.
I did not quite nail my colours.
I personally value "a spacious sound", but I am not a total a soundstage freak either. Flat as a pancake will not do, but cavernous virtual rooms are not needed for me to enjoy music, but I do not mind them.
The system I described delivered this, on the right LP's or CD's. I am not sure how many others do.
But the point, cavernous soundstaging is not impossible on CD, but many factors conspire against it, few that are down to the format itself.
I suggest you read my (still dumbed down) sidebar to an interview, to illustrate my take on DS and MB.
Thor
At 20 bits, you are on the verge of dynamic range covering fly-farts-at-20-feet to intolerable pain. Really, what more could we need?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: About depth of field with digital - Thorsten 11:09:14 05/10/15 (1)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - beppe61 13:29:15 05/10/15 (0)