In Reply to: RE: About depth of field with digital posted by beppe61 on May 7, 2015 at 23:34:17:
Heppe,
The music tracks on Sheffield are the best tests. If you can get what you want with Sheffield you're done, others CD's will reveal what's in it then.
As you know every minus 6 dB on CD means 1 bit less resolution. Ambiance, "depth", natural sound rendering all are minus 20 to minus 60 dB very low level signal. These can't be reproduced like with the best analogue recordings, vinyl, reel to reel. That's why "depth" on CD is alway's artificially added by digital sound processors to suggest some depth/ambiance, even on reissues. And that sounds not right.
So don't be disappointed if you don't get things like you have in your mind. Fiddle around with Audacity to observe the frequency's above 1 kHz and their levels. (Spectrum analizer) You'll see the very low levels, calculate the resolution and you'll see for yourself. Digital is the best format for convenience, but a major setback in soundquality after the best analogue formats/recordings/ platters.
I say this after 25 years of CD's, upgrading, tweaking, buying remastered CD's. For pure musical enjoyment it never topped my 45's, 331/3 and even 78's that I collected since the late 50-ties. CD's give me listening fatigue, since more than 15 years I stopped buying CD's because of dynamic compression except some CD's that are good.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: About depth of field with digital - huubdas 05:22:58 05/08/15 (19)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - rkeman 17:22:45 05/11/15 (1)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - huubdas 17:53:59 05/11/15 (0)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - beppe61 06:21:38 05/08/15 (16)
- the blind leading the blind ... - TBone 09:04:48 05/08/15 (5)
- RE: the blind leading the blind ... - beppe61 09:20:34 05/08/15 (4)
- RE: the blind leading the blind ... - TBone 09:46:16 05/08/15 (3)
- RE: the blind leading the blind ... - beppe61 12:47:34 05/08/15 (2)
- RE: the blind leading the blind ... - TBone 13:05:25 05/08/15 (1)
- RE: the blind leading the blind ... - beppe61 22:49:59 05/08/15 (0)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - huubdas 07:43:33 05/08/15 (9)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - beppe61 09:54:19 05/08/15 (4)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - huubdas 15:17:33 05/08/15 (3)
- you're confused ... - TBone 15:35:37 05/08/15 (2)
- RE: you're confused ... - huubdas 16:36:56 05/08/15 (0)
- RE: you're confused ... - huubdas 16:25:20 05/08/15 (0)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - TBone 09:10:50 05/08/15 (3)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - huubdas 15:44:39 05/08/15 (2)
- skill testing question ... - TBone 18:21:46 05/08/15 (1)
- RE: skill testing question ... - huubdas 20:34:13 05/08/15 (0)