In Reply to: RE: About depth of field with digital posted by unclestu on May 7, 2015 at 19:05:58:
Hi and thanks a lot for the very interesting suggestion
I read the review on TAS ... a very interesting unit indeed.
I am not an expert but i guess that inside a dac some kind of processing goes on and that is the point.
Some dacs perform this processing in a way that is less detrimental for sound.
For instance digital filterless dacs are said to sound much more musical.
I think that digital filters can make or break the sound.
Like i think that delta-sigma dac chip can be perfectly fine, like the unit you mention clearly shows.
I read also another thing but i am not sure i have understood rightly.
Upsampling redbook to dsd should allow for the use of analog filters, much less detrimental for the sound.
What i find really strange is that digital filters are not so popular in the discussions on digital sources.
Much less than dac chip, power supplies, output stages.
When i see what normal digital filters do to the signal i am surprised.
Things like the pre-ringing ... a signal popping up before the actual signal ??? is that a "sonic premonition" ?
how could that be acceptable ? how could people live with that ?
Thanks a lot again.
Kind regards,
bg
Edits: 05/07/15
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: About depth of field with digital - beppe61 23:46:06 05/07/15 (3)
- RE: About depth of field - unclestu 11:23:42 05/08/15 (2)
- RE: About depth of field - beppe61 10:04:58 05/12/15 (0)
- RE: About depth of field - rick_m 08:48:25 05/09/15 (0)