Home Digital Drive

Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it.

on the fence ...

no pertinent experience with either DAC, but from what I understand, some Berkeley DACs use the 1704/HDCD chipset, which (arguably) represents the best possible 16bit sound reproduction. Yet, I've heard both good & bad about 'em; so I'm more than curious to hear one myself.

>>I am really hard trying to understand if this "multibit revival" is completely justified and the only way to get good sound is to go and hunt for one of these old dacs.<<

Certainly NOT the only way to get "good" sound, but arguably the best way to attain the ultimate 16bit sound.

No denying that a well implemented multi-bit 1702/4 chipset is potentially going to outperform a delta-sigma 1732 chip, but here's the rub ... my player utilizes the 1732HDCD chip; however it was demo'd against a very well implemented 1702/HDCD (SIM) player.

Entering that demo, I'd pre-figured I'd be walking out with the SIM 1702 based player which just so happens, looked very unique, and a TON more high-end/superior to it's competitor (Linn); but looks can be deceiving...

Both players proved to be superb performers (at a time when precious few "great" CD players existed (IMO)). I could have happily lived with either. But in the end, although they both displayed unique advantages, I chose the 1732 based player because it had one advantage I personally/musically covet; it remained open & transparent (less dynamic compression) during peak/difficult passages.

tb1


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  VH Audio  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.