In Reply to: It would be a deal-breaker for me indeed.....to this reviewers credibility. posted by Thorsten on January 1, 2015 at 21:38:21:
"DAC's output was loaded with 200 kΩ in parallel with 400 pF. I saw no difference in in self-jitter or jitter rejection or anything regardless of if I used the TOSLINK or coaxial input.""10 kHz Sine Wave, Narrowband FFT (self-jitter test)
Output spectrum, TOSLINK input from R&S UPL. (Coax input was the same.)
This is poor; . . . . I popped my Benchmark DAC1 HDR in to reality-check my lab setup; it was as clean as always."
© 2013 KenRockwell.com. All rights reserved.
P.S.
The DAC's power cord has no ground prong.
Edits: 01/02/15 01/02/15 01/02/15
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: It would be a deal-breaker for me indeed.....to this reviewers credibility. - dave789 05:25:41 01/02/15 (25)
- RE: It would be a deal-breaker for me indeed.....to this reviewers credibility. - Thorsten 07:42:06 01/02/15 (24)
- RE: It would be a deal-breaker for me indeed.....to this reviewers credibility. - dave789 12:04:11 01/02/15 (23)
- RE: It would be a deal-breaker for me indeed.....to this reviewers credibility. - Thorsten 13:01:57 01/02/15 (22)
- serial numbers - dave789 15:16:01 01/02/15 (0)
- RE: It would be a deal-breaker for me indeed.....to this reviewers credibility. - dave789 15:09:05 01/02/15 (20)
- RE: It would be a deal-breaker for me indeed.....to this reviewers credibility. - Thorsten 19:22:16 01/02/15 (10)
- "mains related side-bands which are NOT jitter" - dave789 19:31:22 01/02/15 (7)
- RE: "mains related side-bands which are NOT jitter" - Thorsten 19:57:55 01/02/15 (6)
- a pic on the web - dave789 20:21:32 01/02/15 (4)
- Let me ask you something.... - Thorsten 23:41:31 01/02/15 (3)
- RE: Let me ask you something.... - dave789 23:55:57 01/02/15 (2)
- RE: Let me ask you something.... - Thorsten 00:04:05 01/03/15 (1)
- RE: Let me ask you something.... - dave789 01:16:20 01/03/15 (0)
- RE: "mains related side-bands which are NOT jitter" - dave789 20:14:23 01/02/15 (0)
- RE: It would be a deal-breaker for me indeed.....to this reviewers credibility. - dave789 19:30:00 01/02/15 (1)
- RE: It would be a deal-breaker for me indeed.....to this reviewers credibility. - Tony Lauck 07:47:09 01/03/15 (0)
- RE: It would be a deal-breaker for me indeed.....to this reviewers credibility. - Tony Lauck 18:00:39 01/02/15 (8)
- RE: It would be a deal-breaker for me indeed.....to this reviewers credibility. - dave789 18:26:05 01/02/15 (7)
- RE: It would be a deal-breaker for me indeed.....to this reviewers credibility. - Tony Lauck 18:50:19 01/02/15 (6)
- RE: It would be a deal-breaker for me indeed.....to this reviewers credibility. - dave789 19:37:50 01/02/15 (5)
- RE: It would be a deal-breaker for me indeed.....to this reviewers credibility. - Thorsten 23:53:12 01/02/15 (4)
- RE: It would be a deal-breaker for me indeed.....to this reviewers credibility. - dave789 00:02:08 01/03/15 (3)
- RE: It would be a deal-breaker for me indeed.....to this reviewers credibility. - Tony Lauck 07:23:52 01/03/15 (2)
- RE: It would be a deal-breaker for me indeed.....to this reviewers credibility. - dave789 07:38:47 01/03/15 (1)
- RE: It would be a deal-breaker for me indeed.....to this reviewers credibility. - Tony Lauck 08:01:15 01/03/15 (0)