Well... that's the thing - "better", especially with digital, always means pretty much the same, IME.

However, some of the most obvious things are:

- more dimensional sound, with all 3 dimansions of the soundstage getting larger;
- higher resolution, but at the same time smoother;
- stronger bass.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Is the Sony SCD222ES awful for redbook playback or not? - Mr Blue Sky 12:39:52 09/15/14 (13)

Mine died - in the trash - MarkCR 20:08:01 09/19/14 (0)

RE: Is the Sony SCD222ES awful for redbook playback or not? - fantja 09:56:13 09/19/14 (0)

I owned one - ydavid 14:39:53 09/16/14 (0)

isn't that a changer? good reason to stay away. - Tom Schuman 00:41:28 09/16/14 (1)

RE: good reason to stay away. - unclestu 23:52:30 09/16/14 (0)

I had it for a short time, for Redbook only. You can safely skip it. - carcass93 14:37:16 09/15/14 (2)

RE: I had it for a short time, for Redbook only. You can safely skip it. - Mr Blue Sky 14:46:27 09/15/14 (1)

Well... that's the thing - "better", especially with digital, always means pretty much the same, IME. - carcass93 13:05:18 09/16/14 (0)

RE: Is the Sony SCD222ES awful for redbook playback or not? - fantja 13:21:27 09/15/14 (4)

RE: Is the Sony SCD222ES awful for redbook playback or not? - Mr Blue Sky 13:30:49 09/15/14 (3)

Trouble is, that's not really possible. - Dave Pogue 05:39:41 09/19/14 (1)

RE: Trouble is, that's not really possible. - Tony Lauck 10:40:56 09/19/14 (0)

RE: Is the Sony SCD222ES awful for redbook playback or not? - fantja 17:05:10 09/15/14 (0)

Follow Ups

Well... that's the thing - "better", especially with digital, always means pretty much the same, IME. - carcass93 13:05:18 09/16/14 (0)

Well... that's the thing - "better", especially with digital, always means pretty much the same, IME.

Post a Message!