|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: Another concise RGA response! posted by E-Stat on March 19, 2014 at 05:44:30:
"Considering results from the large number of studies on aspartame's safety, including five previously conducted negative chronic carcinogenicity studies, a recently reported large epidemiology study with negative associations between the use of aspartame and the occurrence of tumors, and negative findings from a series of three transgenic mouse assays, FDA finds no reason to alter its previous conclusion that aspartame is safe as a general purpose sweetener in food."
This is all BS. The use of statistics where results are done at the typical 5% level is subject to all kinds of selection problems. There is an obvious economic motive to do this selection. Real science, e.g. physics, uses statistics properly (e.g. 5 and 6 sigma) and even then runs into the occasional problem of screw ups (e.g. CERN "faster than light" neutrinos, but these results didn't survive peer review).
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Another concise RGA response! - Tony Lauck 07:08:45 03/19/14 (3)
- RE: Another concise RGA response! - E-Stat 07:16:47 03/19/14 (2)
- RE: Another concise RGA response! - Tony Lauck 07:27:28 03/19/14 (1)
- Ok - E-Stat 08:12:05 03/19/14 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
