In Reply to: I have just read this and posted by fmak on March 15, 2014 at 23:10:40:
fmak,I believe that the marketing copy refers to a clock recovery technique based around an NCO (numerically controlled oscillator), rather than around the usual analog VCXO. An NCO can track a wider input range than can an VCXO, yet still generate a frequency locked, low jitter local clock. The NCO frequency can be adjusted in very fine steps so to closely match the remote source's clock frequency, enabling a quasi-free running of the NCO.
Because the source clock's long term frequency average must be followed to account for drift, there still can be some jitter transfer if the NCO frequency requires subsequent adjusting, but such jitter would be at very low frequency. So, yes, there still will be some intrinsic jitter stemming from the NCO circuitry itself, and also possibly some very low frequency jitter transferred from the remote source's clock, depending on that remote clock's long term frequency stability. Not exactly zero jitter, but if properly implemented, can perform very well on reducing both intrinsic and transferred jitter.
_
Ken Newton
Edits: 03/16/14
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: I have just read this and - knewton 20:33:50 03/16/14 (22)
- RE: I have just read this and - Tony Lauck 15:15:28 03/17/14 (0)
- RE: I have just read this and-thanks - fmak 12:43:28 03/17/14 (20)
- RE: I have just read this and-thanks - knewton 13:15:11 03/17/14 (19)
- RE: I have just read this and-thanks - fmak 14:28:56 03/17/14 (18)
- RE: I have just read this and-thanks - knewton 18:15:13 03/17/14 (17)
- RE: I have just read this and-thanks-Google - fmak 03:19:59 03/18/14 (16)
- RE: I have just read this and-thanks-Google - knewton 06:45:20 03/18/14 (15)
- what it sounded like - fmak 08:43:10 03/18/14 (1)
- RE: what it sounded like - knewton 10:08:12 03/18/14 (0)
- Looking for serious reading material - Tony Lauck 07:20:14 03/18/14 (12)
- RE: Looking for serious reading material-Hardware - fmak 00:18:24 03/19/14 (3)
- RE: Looking for serious reading material-Hardware - Tony Lauck 06:51:42 03/19/14 (2)
- RE: Looking for serious reading material-Hardware-Have - fmak 08:35:27 03/19/14 (1)
- RE: Looking for serious reading material-Hardware-Have - Tony Lauck 11:33:16 03/19/14 (0)
- RE: Looking for serious reading material - Ted Smith 12:46:16 03/18/14 (2)
- RE: Looking for serious reading material - Tony Lauck 13:45:34 03/19/14 (0)
- RE: Looking for serious reading material - Tony Lauck 13:19:35 03/18/14 (0)
- RE: Looking for serious reading material_I do know - fmak 08:40:28 03/18/14 (4)
- RE: Looking for serious reading material_I do know - Tony Lauck 12:19:43 03/18/14 (3)
- RE: Looking for serious reading material_I do know - knewton 05:27:14 03/19/14 (1)
- RE: Looking for serious reading material_I do know - Tony Lauck 06:14:29 03/19/14 (0)
- RE: Looking for serious reading material_I do know - fmak 23:00:08 03/18/14 (0)