|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: I have just read this and posted by fmak on March 15, 2014 at 23:10:40:
"to totally eliminate jitter coming from the source."
Jitter from the source is (largely) replaced with jitter from our digital synthesizer.
"to exactly match the dynamic input clock down to 0.001Hz (i.e. ~0.04ppm accuracy) of the source."
Which are impressive numbers but irrelevant. The main benefit of a small step size is a cost savings for the manufacturer in terms of the buffer memory needed. There will be no benefit in sound quality so long as there is no need to make corrections during playback, which relates to the buffer size and the clock stepping.
"With this new and completely jitterless clock"
Liar, liar, pants on fire! No clock can be completely jitterless. The synthesizer mechanism can not reduce jitter below the jitter of the XO used as its reference.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Liar, liar, pants on fire! - Tony Lauck 07:54:24 03/16/14 (4)
- RE: Liar, liar, pants on fire!Sigh - fmak 08:50:30 03/16/14 (3)
- RE: Liar, liar, pants on fire!Sigh - Tony Lauck 10:07:12 03/16/14 (2)
- RE: Liar, liar, pants on fire!Sigh - fmak 10:11:35 03/16/14 (1)
- RE: Liar, liar, pants on fire!Sigh - Tony Lauck 10:17:58 03/16/14 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
