63.231.54.25
'); } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } // End --> |
This Post Has Been Edited by the Author
In Reply to: RE: Why not just say it was an Arcam rDac...not exactly 2x the cost. posted by steveassante@comcast.net on June 05, 2012 at 17:10:14
Interesting you should say that (the bit quoted in my subject line), because for DACs like that, the upsampling by default is considered a "feature"--essential to both the concept of the DAC itself, and the marketing strategy. Simply imagining that part of the DAC vanquished, how can you then speculate with regards to the end result?
Follow Ups: