In Reply to: here's an interesting read about why it isn't posted by bwb on August 23, 2012 at 07:55:51:
The basis of the article is about the writere's own camera systems.
He discusses the problems with current camera sensors. and moves to frame rates. Explains why frame rates are important.
IMO NONE of that precludes a higher data rate. Whether from more pixels, or higher frame rates, more is still usefull.
As the writer describes in the article: you start with a data rate say 4K, and then you lose some..
So even though 4K may be overkill, why not? better than the way CD has been, with the minimum. Let's start with the maximum!!
Hell Yeah.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Ture it is interesting, but the article really is not about 4K it is about cameras - Elizabeth 17:28:47 08/24/12 (0)