In Reply to: Why not just say it was an Arcam rDac...not exactly 2x the cost. posted by Dynobot on June 5, 2012 at 15:33:36:
Mainly, because it is not an Arcam rDac. ( I actually do have that one also & I believe it does use a Wolfson chip.). If memory serves me correct the rDAC is only about $129 more & is not quite as good as the Musical Fidelity M1 I was using.I really did'nt want to come out & name it as I still think the MF is a pretty good product. If the up sampling could be disabled I think it might trump the Bifrost.
Edits: 06/05/12
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Why not just say it was an Arcam rDac...not exactly 2x the cost. - steveassante@comcast.net 17:10:14 06/05/12 (4)
- RE: "If the up sampling could be disabled I think it might trump the Bifrost" - willkayakforfood 17:18:02 06/05/12 (3)
- I've Been Saying This for Years......... - Todd Krieger 14:32:30 06/06/12 (1)
- Upsampling - sbrians 08:31:48 06/07/12 (0)
- RE: "If the up sampling could be disabled I think it might trump the Bifrost" - steveassante@comcast.net 12:19:38 06/06/12 (0)