In Reply to: I did a "re-evaluation" of my Schiit Bifrost DAC ; The bad news is ... posted by steveassante@comcast.net on June 3, 2012 at 21:05:56:
"It turns out the Bifrost sounds a lot better than I thought it did ! The only problem is I like it a bit more than the 2x as expensive DAC I replaced it with !"
What 2x as expensive DAC did your Bifrost replace ?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "I like it a bit more than the 2x as expensive DAC" - AbeCollins 10:21:21 06/05/12 (7)
- RE: "I like it a bit more than the 2x as expensive DAC" - steveassante@comcast.net 14:37:59 06/05/12 (6)
- Why not just say it was an Arcam rDac...not exactly 2x the cost. - Dynobot 15:33:36 06/05/12 (5)
- RE: Why not just say it was an Arcam rDac...not exactly 2x the cost. - steveassante@comcast.net 17:10:14 06/05/12 (4)
- RE: "If the up sampling could be disabled I think it might trump the Bifrost" - willkayakforfood 17:18:02 06/05/12 (3)
- I've Been Saying This for Years......... - Todd Krieger 14:32:30 06/06/12 (1)
- Upsampling - sbrians 08:31:48 06/07/12 (0)
- RE: "If the up sampling could be disabled I think it might trump the Bifrost" - steveassante@comcast.net 12:19:38 06/06/12 (0)