In Reply to: RE: he's not completely wrong ... posted by knewton on March 13, 2012 at 11:49:42:
"If it's possible to produce one truly good sounding CD, then it seems that it should be possible to consistently do so. Is it just fortunate happenstance when a good sounding CD is produced?"
Of course it's possible since it's proven. Think back to other formats you have used... In my case as an adult: LP/Stereo 33's, R-R tape, Cassettes, CD's, Radio, Internet streaming, SACD, and 78's and 45's as a kid or on jukeboxes. Even 16 2/3... You know what, their sound varied all over the place within each format. All media has limitations but, strictly from my experience, the major limitations are usually at the source and stepping end of the chain.
Regards, Rick
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: he's not completely wrong ... - rick_m 13:59:43 03/13/12 (13)
- RE: he's not completely wrong ... - knewton 06:28:10 03/14/12 (12)
- RE: he's not completely wrong ... - rick_m 09:51:08 03/14/12 (11)
- RE: he's not completely wrong ... - knewton 10:35:20 03/14/12 (10)
- RE: he's not completely wrong ... - rick_m 13:47:35 03/14/12 (9)
- RE: he's not completely wrong ... - knewton 07:12:00 03/15/12 (8)
- RE: he's not completely wrong ... - rick_m 08:30:53 03/15/12 (7)
- RE: he's not completely wrong ... - knewton 12:20:47 03/15/12 (2)
- RE: he's not completely wrong ... - rick_m 16:32:51 03/15/12 (0)
- RE: he's not completely wrong ... - Tony Lauck 14:21:30 03/15/12 (0)
- RE: he's not completely wrong ... - tom.dennehy 09:06:04 03/15/12 (3)
- RE: he's not completely wrong ... - Tony Lauck 13:30:58 03/15/12 (2)
- RE: he's not completely wrong ... - tom.dennehy 17:25:34 03/15/12 (1)
- notice, but not attribute until confirmed - Tony Lauck 06:19:19 03/16/12 (0)