In Reply to: Another logical inference posted by Jim Austin on January 4, 2012 at 11:30:17:
>>The qualities that make vinyl preferable to digital (for those who hold this opinion) are additive<<
Like "added" dynamic contrast and freq. extension?
>>Otherwise the sound of vinyl would not be preserved in a digital transfer.<<
The sound isn't totally "preserved" ... but in terms of tonal discrepancies/issues, which often differentiates vinyl from it's digital counterpart, I agree.
TB1
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- not that simple ... - TBone 11:43:55 01/04/12 (32)
- RE: not that simple ... - Jim Austin 14:09:19 01/04/12 (31)
- RE: not that simple ... - TBone 14:49:07 01/04/12 (30)
- Vinyl has more technical limitations than CD/Digital - Freo-1 15:10:37 01/04/12 (29)
- digital has it's own sonic issues ... - TBone 10:14:23 01/05/12 (28)
- RE: digital has it's own sonic issues ... - Dawnrazor 08:56:21 01/10/12 (0)
- If you think Vinyl is better that digital.. - Freo-1 13:48:08 01/05/12 (26)
- so cliche ... - TBone 14:01:50 01/05/12 (25)
- But SO True... - Freo-1 14:45:36 01/05/12 (24)
- RE: But SO True... - TBone 15:09:31 01/05/12 (22)
- RE: But SO True... - Freo-1 15:31:26 01/05/12 (21)
- RE: But SO True... - TBone 15:43:16 01/05/12 (20)
- We are getting off track.... back to the topic - Freo-1 15:53:54 01/05/12 (19)
- why? - TBone 16:59:45 01/05/12 (18)
- RE: why? - John Elison 18:50:27 01/07/12 (14)
- RE: why? - Dr.Phil 06:14:14 01/10/12 (4)
- RE: why? - TBone 14:18:08 01/10/12 (3)
- RE: why? - TBone 10:24:22 01/09/12 (8)
- RE: why? - John Elison 14:01:54 01/09/12 (7)
- RE: why? - TBone 14:15:17 01/09/12 (6)
- It's physics - Freo-1 14:55:59 01/09/12 (5)
- RE: It's physics - John Elison 17:57:07 01/09/12 (2)
- it's very ironic, but easily explained ... - TBone 14:06:10 01/10/12 (0)
- Its music - tmsorosk 04:00:55 01/10/12 (0)
- nothing subjective about ... - TBone 15:29:49 01/09/12 (1)
- RE: nothing subjective about ... - Tony Lauck 19:13:23 01/18/12 (0)
- RE: why? - Freo-1 18:18:01 01/05/12 (2)
- RE: why? - knewton 14:38:05 01/06/12 (1)
- Good points... - Freo-1 05:46:59 01/07/12 (0)
- RE: But SO True... - Tony Lauck 15:04:37 01/05/12 (0)