In Reply to: RE: All FIR filters are fatally flawed. posted by jmlpartners on February 11, 2009 at 20:38:10:
>>Hey Tony, in case you forgot, the goal of the digital signal in question was to recreate two cycles of a 20KHz sine wave
That is NOT a band-limited signal, and can NOT be correctly recreated by a system sampling at 44.1. Not NOS, not upsampled. Never. Until and unless you understand the very important implications of that, further discussion is completely meaningless. Bickering about filters etc is completely meaningless if you violate the basic primary assumption of sampling theory. THAT is why Tony correctly pointed you at signal theory references.
This is probably the millionth time someone has advanced this argument on this forum. It was wrong the first time. It's wrong now. It'll be wrong next month when someone else tries it again.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- You STILL don't get it - dwk 08:18:33 02/12/09 (2)
- No, I DO get it. - jmlpartners 10:16:03 02/12/09 (1)
- RE: No, I DO get it. - Tony Lauck 10:41:13 02/12/09 (0)