|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Can you share your thoughts on the Wavelength Audio Brick posted by Julien43 on February 7, 2009 at 07:24:30:
Two points
1. Financial constraints not withstanding, it may not be a good longer term stategy to restrict to rbcd on a PC. I have converted nearly all my cd wav files to 176.4k on a low power PC using Audition 3. The superior sound is well worth it. This has nothing with adding information, probably much more to do withphase distortions associated with the brick wall filters. Again 192k sounds much better than 96k. The gain is in image placement, sound staging and more delicate hf. Some 20% of my material is now genuine hirez (from source recordings).
Having said this, it is easier to have a reasonable sounding PC at rbcd.
2. It is my experience that buying something for the moment costs more in the end; better go for a component which will accommodate the best software.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Can you share your thoughts on the Wavelength Audio Brick - fmak 11:11:48 02/07/09 (1)
- Excellent points - Julien43 02:57:49 02/11/09 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
