In Reply to: Yeah, but posted by Jon L on September 27, 2008 at 09:28:40:
Adding digital inputs seems like an easy idea. But the reality is unfortunately different.
The problem is that when you are playing an optical disc, there is a master audio clock that controls everything, particularly the conversion rate of the DAC chip itself. There is a buffer to hold audio data in the player, and if the buffer gets too full, the control circuitry slows the disc down. Conversely if the buffer becomes too empty, the disc is sped up.
The key thing is that the master clock is in charge of everything. It is a fixed-frequency device, and can be made with exceptionally low jitter.
But adding a digital input creates a complete can of worms. The problem is that the master clock has now been moved to the transport. The DAC must now adapt to, and follow the transport. This means that the clock in the DAC must be variable in frequency. A variable frequency clock always has higher jitter than a fixed frequency clock.
The problem is further complicated by the fact that the only existing format for the transfer of digital audio data (S/PDIF) is basically broken. Trying to recover the clock from the signal transmitted from the transport is a tough nut to crack. Basically, there are no clever trick here -- the only way to get better performance is to throw money at the problem.
So if you want a digital input, the choice is add a cheap one for several hundreds of dollars (but that will sound quite mediocre) or add an expensive one that will sound good for several thousands of dollars.
The first way hurts the reputation of the player (and the company), while the second way will result in sharply reduced sales, and for a feature that probably less than 10% of the customers would ever use.
So that is why you rarely see a digital input on a player.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Digital inputs - Charles Hansen 20:47:55 09/27/08 (25)
- Total correlated jitter 130pS. What do you think? - AbeCollins 19:49:47 09/29/08 (5)
- Upon re-reading the white paper - Charles Hansen 23:10:41 09/29/08 (3)
- Posted to DIYAUDIO - AbeCollins 15:23:13 09/30/08 (2)
- Abe, are you still reading this? - Charles Hansen 20:12:13 10/04/08 (0)
- RE: Posted to DIYAUDIO - Charles Hansen 21:43:54 09/30/08 (0)
- Holy mackerel! - Charles Hansen 20:45:19 09/29/08 (0)
- But there's this reviewer at 6moons that thinks - hotbird 20:26:02 09/28/08 (1)
- That reminds me of something a customer once asked - Charles Hansen 21:07:39 09/28/08 (0)
- I wonder.... - Audio Pharaoh 07:31:18 09/28/08 (5)
- More on digital inputs - Charles Hansen 21:00:47 09/28/08 (1)
- More on Accuphase - Charles Hansen 21:25:03 09/28/08 (0)
- Accuphase - AbeCollins 10:34:15 09/28/08 (2)
- Hey, Abe - Jon L 12:48:46 09/28/08 (1)
- RE: Hey, Abe - AbeCollins 13:47:43 09/28/08 (0)
- No DAC's - Jon L 21:18:08 09/27/08 (10)
- If you want multiple inputs - hotbird 20:41:53 09/28/08 (9)
- I actually agree with Charles - Jon L 21:34:48 09/28/08 (8)
- RE: I actually agree with Charles - Charles Hansen 21:43:47 09/28/08 (7)
- RE: I actually agree with Charles - Fitzcaraldo215 12:12:33 10/11/08 (0)
- If I understand you correctly... - budget fi 16:04:31 09/29/08 (5)
- RE: If I understand you correctly... - Fitzcaraldo215 13:12:47 10/13/08 (0)
- RE: If I understand you correctly... - Charles Hansen 17:36:04 09/29/08 (3)
- RE: If I understand you correctly... - Pinkus 11:53:13 09/30/08 (1)
- RE: If I understand you correctly... - Charles Hansen 21:53:04 09/30/08 (0)
- That would be great news!nt - budget fi 18:45:19 09/29/08 (0)