If this info is accurate, no wonder most rock/pop cd's sound like absolute crap on my system.For those who haven't seen it, the webpage provides graphical representations of how music on cd's have less and less dynamic range/headroom between 1983 and present day.
1983Bryan Adams - Cuts Like a Knife (A&M CD-3288)
This represents the earliest stage of CD audio mastering techniques. One of the big attractions of the CD format was its very wide dynamic range and absence of surface noise, so the first generation of CDs that were released made full use of this.
The CD's digital audio format is inherently limited to a peak audio amplitude that is referenced as "0 dB" or "100%". Unlike the variability of analog recording techniques, this limit cannot be exceeded. If you try to, you end up with a waveform that is horribly distorted, due to the top and/or bottom of the wave being harshly limited to the maximum level -- or "clipped." Early CDs were mastered with full respect to this loudness limit and did not use any clipping.
In this case, Bryan Adams' breakthrough album -- although full of stereotypically "loud" rock & roll music -- was mastered with a great amount of "headroom"; the highest peak level on the entire disc is only 74.8%, or -2.52 dB. This peak level only occurs a single time on the disc, in Track 9, whose waveform graph is shown here (with the stereo Left channel on top, and Right channel on bottom):
Obviously this peak (which occurs at around 2:16 in the song) is not even close to being clipped, and in fact the loudness of the whole CD could be increased by 2.5 dB without sacrificing any quality or harming the content of the recordings in any way. That single peak would simply be raised up to just below the 100% limit. You can think of this as a short person raising up the height-adjustable driver's seat in their car. They would sit at a higher level, with their head just below the ceiling, but not touching it -- in this case, literal "headroom".
1999Ricky Martin (C2/Columbia CK 69891)
By now I don't think I have to explain what you see below. And in this case, it probably will help explain why your ears start to hurt after listening to "Livin' La Vida Loca" even for just a short time!
![]()
And as we zoom in, the audio carnage is apparent:
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - darkmoebius 21:20:31 11/22/06 (48)
- Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - George Mann 03:17:28 11/23/06 (36)
- George... - Audio Pharaoh 10:01:06 11/29/06 (0)
- Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - admirer0x0@hotmail.com 03:32:18 11/29/06 (1)
- Yep, jitter is a real problem - Ted Smith 10:04:31 11/29/06 (0)
- Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - audioengr 14:13:12 11/23/06 (3)
- Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - George Mann 14:25:34 11/23/06 (2)
- Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - audioengr 16:49:32 11/23/06 (0)
- There's no such word as "irregardless" and . . . - lazarus28 15:36:32 11/23/06 (0)
- Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - Ted Smith 14:00:52 11/23/06 (14)
- Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - George Mann 14:37:52 11/23/06 (13)
- I Think You're Trying To Say..... - Todd Krieger 00:28:43 11/24/06 (0)
- I understand and agree with the very essence of what you are saying ! - Quiet Earth 22:04:06 11/23/06 (0)
- Nobody "understand(s) what I am saying here?" ..Like I said, utter and complete gibberish...nt - NewStevo 20:34:14 11/23/06 (0)
- Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - Ted Smith 19:19:14 11/23/06 (9)
- Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - Werner 23:54:24 11/23/06 (8)
- Sorry folks, I failed to clarify my position in a way you can relate to. - George Mann 02:21:28 11/24/06 (7)
- Re: Sorry folks, I failed to clarify my position in a way you can relate to. - Werner 02:51:34 11/24/06 (6)
- You people are hopeless, and I never should have expected you to understand! - George Mann 03:01:49 11/24/06 (5)
- Nope, we know that it isn't perfect - Ted Smith 09:22:30 11/24/06 (4)
- And I'm afraid you never will. nt. - George Mann 11:25:09 11/24/06 (3)
- We know the standard technology and terminology, why do you give up so easily? [nt] - Ted Smith 11:31:46 11/24/06 (2)
- It would be best just to drop the subject. Here's why... - George Mann 12:06:49 11/24/06 (1)
- You might get some respect if you showed others some... - Ted Smith 12:47:13 11/24/06 (0)
- WOW!...What a bunch of gibberish....talk about pseudo-science!..nt - NewStevo 08:06:55 11/23/06 (13)
- Perhap's you should stick to a subject you have a clue about! nt. - George Mann 10:04:59 11/23/06 (12)
- Well it's obvious from your previous post that you know nothing about CDs and dynamic range...utter gibberish...nt - NewStevo 11:48:18 11/23/06 (11)
- As one of the engineers involved in its creation, I have forgoten more about it than you will ever know son! nt. - George Mann 12:48:07 11/23/06 (10)
- Re:that's a scary thought - mls-stl 10:11:19 11/24/06 (9)
- I am thru trying to explain it to you MORONS! - George Mann 11:22:27 11/24/06 (8)
- you exhibit the classic signs of a crackpot - tunenut 12:08:03 11/26/06 (4)
- I exhibit authentic digital knowledge that obviously isn't taught these days! - George Mann 13:58:40 11/26/06 (3)
- I guess calling people MORONS is "authentic digital knowledge" - tunenut 18:39:40 11/26/06 (2)
- Your just a closed minded fool who will never understand the real problems with digital! nt. - George Mann 07:07:34 11/27/06 (1)
- I probably appreciate analog more than you do - tunenut 09:33:03 11/27/06 (0)
- Re: I am thru trying to explain it to you MORONS! - Todd Krieger 12:17:46 11/24/06 (1)
- Well... - George Mann 12:57:49 11/24/06 (0)
- Re: could that be because you haven't tried? - mls-stl 11:34:56 11/24/06 (0)
- Some succeed - smart845 00:17:53 11/23/06 (0)
- Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - Werner 23:49:43 11/22/06 (0)
- Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - audioengr 22:24:15 11/22/06 (8)
- I don't completely agree with all of that. - Quiet Earth 09:06:46 11/23/06 (5)
- Re: I don't completely agree with all of that. - audioengr 10:12:08 11/23/06 (4)
- Re: I don't completely agree with all of that. - Werner 23:58:19 11/23/06 (0)
- That's right. Back in the 50s and 60s . . . - Quiet Earth 21:51:15 11/23/06 (2)
- Re: That's right. Back in the 50s and 60s . . . - audioengr 12:19:53 11/24/06 (0)
- The late 30's to the early 60's were the golden years of audio! nt. - George Mann 02:24:36 11/24/06 (0)
- I agree.... - darkmoebius 22:53:06 11/22/06 (1)
- Re: I agree.... - tketcham 04:25:17 11/23/06 (0)
You can not post to an archived thread.