Home Digital Drive

Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it.

Point well taken...

in that I cannot say definitively "in my system" I prefer the Apollo to vinyl, since I do not have an analogue setup.
I have heard several very high end vinyl rigs (i.e. At Glen Poors in Chicago, and the one I mentioned elswhere at Quintessence Audio). Great sounding. The richness of the Apollo reminds me of that sound.
True, I probably would hear a world of difference between what I had for turntable/cartridge years ago and what's possible today. I'm sure the same profound advancements in sound have happened to analogue too.
For me, the imperfections of vinyl were intolerable. Even if the sound was not as rich as vinyl I still turned to cd's because I couldn't stand the noise in the reproduction of the recording, as well as the inconvenience of prep for playing vinyl. In fact, I very much disliked the tape hiss/grey background present on many older AAD cd's. What's amazing is how the Apollo seems to filter out the noise on the older cd's too! They sound FAR better than I have ever heard them. Bonus!
So, yes, I have known that better sound (if one ignores the imperfections associate with vinyl) existed in the Analogue realm, but in my experience with cdps' none within my budgetary constaints has gotten as close to that sound as the Apollo.

As analogue reproduction has gotten better, so has digital. Has the gap closed between them? That's arguable, but I'm guessing many will suggest the Apollo has taken a step toward closing that gap.

I would very much enjoy reading comments from individuals with good analogue rigs who might procure an Apollo for demo or permanent addition to their system. It would be interesting to hear how they feel the Apollo compares to vinyl.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Schiit Audio  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.