In Reply to: Re: glad to hear you enjoy the 306/200 posted by imnfwong@yahoo.com on May 18, 2005 at 22:11:20:
As I wrote before, I have had the 308-T, 306-200 and now the 303-300. There are several differences I hear (and prefer) in the 303-300:
- more localization of bass in the soundfield (I can tell where
instruments are placed in the orchestra)
- the soundstage is deeper, wider and taller
- the sound flows, that is the music will swell, blend, billow up,
fill out the room (like a real ensemble)
- the interplay of instruments allows the blending of timbres,
textures, melodies to be more prominent
- the sound is more palpable, weightyAs I said, I only use the balanced outputs and the tubes are on. I don't care for the sound of the solid state output.
The 303-300 starts to get the music right in the way that an analog system can. Granted, there is still digititis in recordings (glare in high frequency).
Note too that I listen to quite a few HDCD's. The decoding is different in the 306-200 and the 303-300.
As others have said, this is all about preferences and synergy. My tastes may not be your cup of tea.
Above all else ...
Enjoy the music.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: glad to hear you enjoy the 306/200 - oldvinyl 19:52:25 05/19/05 (5)
- Re: glad to hear you enjoy the 306/200 - Jack G 06:06:39 05/20/05 (4)
- Re: glad to hear you enjoy the 306/200 - imnfwong@yahoo.com 22:08:57 05/20/05 (0)
- 303-300 does not use an HDCD chip - oldvinyl 06:51:19 05/20/05 (2)
- How does its decoding compare to other Carys? (nt) - Jack G 07:56:20 05/20/05 (1)
- I much prefer the HDCD solution on the 303-300 (nt) - oldvinyl 14:11:29 05/20/05 (0)