|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: Re: Cary 303/300 vs 306/200 posted by Shoplifter on May 18, 2005 at 22:45:51:
>>>I found that using any of the upsampling made for a brittle sound, and it seemed best with the upsampling off<<<
I found that true of the 306 and the 308T as well. Very synthetic sounding with the upsampling on.>>>There are some build quality issues with the Cary as well<<<
Ditto for the 308TAs for tubes, assuming its sonic signature is similar to the 308T, Teles will nake it more laid back, and sound more detailed and linear-could be boring in the wrong system. Amperex 7316s are nice, depending on the vintage. I found Mullard long plate bass heavy, thick, and slow. Early tungsols aren't bad. You may wish to try philips E80CCs too. There are lots of 12AU7s out there, and I didn't care for most of them.
good luck
Jack
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Cary 303/300 vs 306/200 - Jack G 04:56:19 05/19/05 (1)
- Re: Cary 303/300 vs 306/200 - AbeCollins 15:42:51 05/19/05 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
