In Reply to: Re: Attention Cable Braiders posted by audioengr on September 29, 2002 at 13:51:44:
You got a point. I guess because nobody else made them?Why would someone else have had to make them before it would be obvious to someone (skilled in the art or otherwise) that braids of more than three wires would also be possible?
The irony here is that anyone who Kimber might end up defending their patent against would find their best defense in Kimber's own products.
You'll note that the Kimber patent only cites other patents as references (including one of yours). Strange that someone patenting a four conductor braided cable makes no reference whatsoever to three conductor braided cables that have been in the public domain for at least two decades.
Seems to me that Homegrown or some other companies did make something similar, but this may have been later than the filing date.
Ultimately I think it's irrelevant. After having a three wire braid in the public domain for over two decades, a four wire braid simply isn't "not obvious."
se
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Attention Cable Braiders - Steve Eddy 14:50:57 09/29/02 (16)
- Re: Attention Cable Braiders - audioengr 19:03:21 09/29/02 (15)
- Re: Attention Cable Braiders - Steve Eddy 19:48:37 09/29/02 (14)
- Re: Attention Cable Braiders - MadJack 23:49:35 09/29/02 (13)
- Re: Attention Cable Braiders - Steve Eddy 03:00:11 09/30/02 (12)
- Re: Attention Cable Braiders - Phil Tower 09:54:36 10/01/02 (1)
- Re: Attention Cable Braiders - Steve Eddy 11:55:42 10/01/02 (0)
- Re: Attention Cable Braiders - MadJack 08:04:44 09/30/02 (9)
- By the way... - Steve Eddy 00:38:22 10/01/02 (0)
- Re: Attention Cable Braiders - Steve Eddy 00:16:31 10/01/02 (7)
- Re: Attention Cable Braiders - MadJack 10:28:34 10/01/02 (3)
- Re: Attention Cable Braiders - Steve Eddy 11:20:27 10/01/02 (2)
- Re: Attention Cable Braiders - MadJack 11:34:09 10/01/02 (1)
- Re: Attention Cable Braiders - Steve Eddy 11:51:13 10/01/02 (0)
- Re: Patent, schmatent...... - alan m. kafton 09:12:01 10/01/02 (2)
- Re: Patent, schmatent...... - Steve Eddy 09:25:59 10/01/02 (1)
- Re: Patent, schmatent...... - alan m. kafton 13:19:06 10/01/02 (0)