I dont see

Posted by Awe-d-o-file (D) on April 23, 2016 at 14:03:42

In Reply to: Cable Demo Trickery? posted by Jeff Starr on April 23, 2016 at 11:28:46:

A company, especially one such as Nordost, taking such a risk. Their reputation seems pretty good over many years. But with humans involved anything is possible. I think only entry level philes would percieve volume change to be a qualitative change. As to the assertion tnat changing only one devices power cord couldnt make a difference thats balony. Ive always bought just one at a time, added it to the system and listened for changes. Also changing anything like cabling at the source level always makes the most noticable difference.

Between speaker cables ,interconnects and power cords I think power cords make the largest difference. All aspects of AC delivery are critical to having a first rate system IMO. Every part of AC delivery must be addressed from outlet and vibratuon damping of it, regeneration with lots of headroom for sources only and parallel filtering, chokes for high current devices that wont affect dynamics. Finally Im a firm believer ALL cables sound better if unshielded.

Ill be interested in seeing if Nordost responds to the accusations. Was it determined if Nordost employee did the demo or a distributor? AC is dirtier than ever and needs lots of help and really shows the benefits.

ET
ET

"If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking till you do suck seed" - Curly Howard 1936

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Cable Demo Trickery? - Jeff Starr 11:28:46 04/23/16 (23)

RE: Waldrep got a Cease and Desist letter from Nordost's attornys - Jeff Starr 17:34:44 05/03/16 (0)

So, how did the Pangea compare to your diy?? nt. - ABliss 06:38:56 04/28/16 (1)

RE: So, how did the Pangea compare to your diy?? nt. - Jeff Starr 12:03:08 05/07/16 (0)

I don't think it was trickery... - MannyE 06:12:58 04/27/16 (3)

RE: I don't think it was trickery... - Palustris 08:43:54 04/29/16 (0)

RE: I don't think it was trickery... - Jeff Starr 10:43:17 04/27/16 (1)

RE: I don't think it was trickery... - MannyE 04:57:57 04/28/16 (0)

RE: Cable Demo Trickery? - fantja 23:37:55 04/25/16 (0)

I disagree with Mr Waldrep - johntoste 06:32:09 04/25/16 (3)

RE: I disagree with Mr Waldrep - Palustris 08:49:40 04/29/16 (0)

RE: I disagree with Mr Waldrep - Coner 21:54:26 04/25/16 (1)

RE: I disagree with Mr Waldrep - navman 20:29:14 04/28/16 (0)

I dont see - Awe-d-o-file 14:03:42 04/23/16 (9)

RE: I dont see - Duster 15:43:58 04/23/16 (8)

RE: I dont see - jad 09:15:11 04/24/16 (4)

The fact of the matter.... - alan m. kafton 21:02:54 04/25/16 (3)

RE: The fact of the matter.... - Duster 11:14:06 04/26/16 (1)

RE: The fact of the matter.... - alan m. kafton 12:03:51 04/26/16 (0)

RE: The fact of the matter.... - fantja 23:37:30 04/25/16 (0)

RE: I dont see - Awe-d-o-file 17:14:37 04/23/16 (2)

RE: Could you clarify? - Jeff Starr 19:05:50 04/23/16 (0)

RE: I dont see - Duster 18:38:30 04/23/16 (0)

Very interesting. Thanks for sharing! (nt) - Jonesy 12:30:45 04/23/16 (0)

Follow Ups

I dont see - Awe-d-o-file 14:03:42 04/23/16 (9)

RE: I dont see - Duster 15:43:58 04/23/16 (8)

RE: I dont see - jad 09:15:11 04/24/16 (4)

The fact of the matter.... - alan m. kafton 21:02:54 04/25/16 (3)

RE: The fact of the matter.... - Duster 11:14:06 04/26/16 (1)

RE: The fact of the matter.... - alan m. kafton 12:03:51 04/26/16 (0)

RE: The fact of the matter.... - fantja 23:37:30 04/25/16 (0)

RE: I dont see - Awe-d-o-file 17:14:37 04/23/16 (2)

RE: Could you clarify? - Jeff Starr 19:05:50 04/23/16 (0)

RE: I dont see - Duster 18:38:30 04/23/16 (0)

I dont see

Post a Message!