In Reply to: PING: Uncle Stu Ono.... posted by Winston Smith on September 26, 2014 at 14:46:06:
A Teflon dielectric tends to take far longer to burn-in than other polymers, so expect many hours to pass before the SF-23 shows profound improvements via burn-in. As unclestu said, a burn-in CD or burn-in track played as a loop via computer is a more efficient method than music tracks. Music tracks, both dynamic types and sweeping types are a good second phase method after an initial intensive burn-in process is accomplished. YMMV
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: PING: Uncle Stu Ono.... - Duster 16:49:51 09/26/14 (2)
- RE: Teflon burn in. - rick_m 09:30:40 09/27/14 (0)
- Thanks, Duster! - Winston Smith 20:29:20 09/26/14 (0)