In Reply to: Credibility? posted by mt10425 on June 1, 2012 at 14:49:30:
Hi mt10425,
The nature of the no-text responses and the other post was self-discerning and strategic. My 'status update' about the cable had nothing to do with wanting to help ChrisVH in some manner, as if I were tossing a shill or something. As for my objectivity, credibility, burn-out, here's the deal. I won't be drawn into contentious slugfests in Cable Asylum, since 'cable believers' participating in arguments with naysayers is just as much a no-no in this forum as relentless naysaying is (it takes two to tango). And, I'm not the right hand of the moderator -- I'm just a lone wolf.
Years ago, I found myself scolded by the moderators for acting like a rabid attack dog towards hostile naysayers trying to dump accusations and demands upon 'cable believers'. The Cable Asylum Mission Statement and better clarified explanations about what's acceptable to express in the spirit of this forum have done well to keep things more productive and with minimal bitch slapping. Perhaps JR or Rod will eventually set things straight again within this audiophile forum. As for the real me coming back, I think I'll take a break from Cable Asylum.
Cheers, Duster
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Credibility? - Duster 16:48:26 06/02/12 (1)
- Thanks Duster - mt10425 19:25:11 06/02/12 (0)