130.199.3.130
In Reply to: RE: Or, you could try dynamic loading and tell us how well it works. posted by Al Sekela on June 28, 2007 at 12:45:54
They are spec'd at 59 pf per foot and .490 uH per foot, or 490 nH per foot.59 times 490 = 28910...divide by 1034, give 215.
That's way too high for a dielectric coefficient. Something in the data is incorrect. I suspect the inductance is too high..
It's Z calcs out to 91 ohms. But I question that because the LC product is wacked out..
EDIT: thought about it a bit. They claim foamed dielectric, which should give a DC of around 2... Since the calcs are out by two powers of ten, I think they have put the capacitance and inductance of a ten foot cable, and forgot to divide the numbers by ten..
That still gives a cable Z of 91, but it makes the DC 2.15, now that is more reasonable..
Cheers, John
Edits: 06/28/07Follow Ups: