|
Inmate Central Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome. |
|
|
|
Inmate Central Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Passive cooling posted by Inmate51 on January 13, 2017 at 08:22:12:
A tsunami was a highly likely event well over 50%, the adjacent sea floor is well up the Japan graph for the likelihood of earthquakes and Tsunamis.But this quake was a rare double release of fault lines, and close together. The Fukushima plant was the most vulnerable in the area, given its not wonderful control and protection systems.
LBNL the consequence was going to be horrendous, given the risky build, even for that reactor design.
Warmest
Tim Bailey
Skeptical Measurer & Audio Scrounger
Edits: 01/13/17 01/13/17 01/13/17
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- You are wrong about the likelihood of a Tsunami in that area. - Timbo in Oz 15:23:57 01/13/17 (2)
- RE: You are wrong about the likelihood of a Tsunami in that area. - Inmate51 06:56:44 01/14/17 (1)
- The one MAJOR accident was not due simply nor solely to nature. - Timbo in Oz 09:27:34 01/14/17 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
