In Reply to: MD FT101A vs. Fanfare FT-1A posted by Nglazer on June 22, 2004 at 15:04:31:
I had the Magnum FT-101A then got the FanFare FT-1A because I wanted a high quality tuner with presets and a remote, something the Magnum didn't have.What a mistake! The FanFare sounded 'compressed' and closed in as in lacking dynamic range. It also had a somewhat 'warm' tone but this was due to it's rolled off treble. I tried the two different sets of audio outputs on the back of the FanFare FT-1A but it still had that characteristic compressed sound with missing in action treble.
I don't usually slam a product so badly but I was very disappointed with this tuner after having read a glowing review about it in Steropile. I've owned department store tuners that sound better. I'm not kidding. My Sony A/V receiver and $250 Marantz ST6000 tuner is much better than the FanFare FT-1A as was my Adcom GFT-555ii, Parasound Halo T3, and Magnum FT-101A tuners.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- MD FT101A without a doubt!! I owned both. - AbeCollins 16:53:02 06/22/04 (3)
- Re: MD FT101A without a doubt!! I owned both. - Nglazer 08:43:47 06/23/04 (2)
- Re: MD FT101A without a doubt!! I owned both. - doug s. 14:44:39 07/23/04 (0)
- Re: MD FT101A without a doubt!! I owned both. - beken 09:25:26 06/23/04 (1)