In Reply to: Great discussion, guys.... posted by Lew on September 13, 2016 at 17:49:17:
"See the attached schematic which calls for a 2.8uF cap, but it currently has the 4.7uF cap with the modified leads."
I kind of missed that. That is to say, it didn't dawn on me that banpuka might have meant that he replaced a 2.8uf cap with a modified 4.7uf cap.
That might explain a lot.
Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Great discussion, guys.... - Tre' 18:32:01 09/13/16 (3)
- we all know caps change {usually lower} impedance... there it is... - Cleantimestream 20:52:43 09/13/16 (2)
- RE: we all know caps change {usually lower} impedance... there it is... - Tre' 07:24:13 09/14/16 (1)
- Gee, I have nothing to contribute that will bring more light on the subject, just heat-nT - Cleantimestream 12:47:41 09/14/16 (0)