RE: Using both section of a dual triode for the driver tube

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Using both section of a dual triode for the driver tube - DAK 08:38:59 12/08/16 (70)

Has anyone mentioned the driver's input capacitance? (nt)e - Triode_Kingdom 06:02:16 12/12/16 (1)

RE: Has anyone mentioned the driver's input capacitance? (nt)e - DAK 08:42:22 12/12/16 (0)

+ plate impedance is cut.in half (Jeff.SHOULD like that ... Decreased resistance, - tube not utilized for max - Cleantimestream 04:23:54 12/11/16 (5)

Nope ! Not allowed. Find the right tube, with correct mu and low plate resistance. (nt) - drlowmu 12:03:51 12/13/16 (2)

Nope ! Not allowed. Find the right tube, with correct mu and low plate resistance. (nt) - Cleantimestream 19:03:43 12/13/16 (1)

RE: Nope ! Not allowed. Find the right tube, with correct mu and low plate resistance. (nt) - drlowmu 08:37:56 12/14/16 (0)

wouldn't that be good for a 6su7? - DAK 09:11:23 12/11/16 (1)

RE: wouldn't that be good for a 6su7? - Cleantimestream 14:35:39 12/11/16 (0)

6SU7 - tweakydee 06:20:22 12/10/16 (4)

phases are *NOT* split - PakProtector 14:29:38 01/26/17 (0)

RE: Sounds like a very good idea! - DAK 09:05:30 12/10/16 (0)

Well..... - drlowmu 07:14:46 12/10/16 (1)

RE:You made your point in the first reply. - DAK 09:34:52 12/10/16 (0)

RE: Using both section of a dual triode for the driver tube - used-hifi 18:23:54 12/09/16 (1)

RE: Using both section of a dual triode for the driver tube - DAK 22:00:23 12/09/16 (0)

Sonically, its called the " choir effect ". - drlowmu 07:56:25 12/09/16 (37)

have you guys looked at the harmonic distortion pattern change going from one to two tubes? - morricab 01:15:29 02/02/17 (1)

RE: have you guys looked at the harmonic distortion pattern change going from one to two tubes? - cpotl 05:18:35 02/03/17 (0)

Why do you dismiss the concept? - DAK 08:55:28 12/09/16 (2)

RE: Why do you dismiss the concept? - drlowmu 09:31:04 12/09/16 (1)

Far out we agreed. I will take that. nt. - DAK 10:30:13 12/09/16 (0)

RE: Sonically, its called the " choir effect ". - kyle 08:28:08 12/09/16 (31)

would like to see 'choir efect' measured... - PakProtector 09:13:43 12/16/16 (2)

It was attempted in Glass audio many years ago by some people - richardl 11:19:25 01/20/17 (0)

RE: would like to see 'choir efect' measured... - zarniwoop 14:41:41 12/18/16 (0)

RE: Sonically, its called the " choir effect ". - drlowmu 09:03:50 12/09/16 (27)

RE: Sonically, its called the " choir effect ". - kyle 09:16:48 12/09/16 (26)

RE: Sonically, its called the " choir effect ". - SteveBrown 02:29:48 12/10/16 (24)

Smeared? - gusser 11:57:40 12/12/16 (15)

yes. paralleled sections causing smear is fictional - zarniwoop 17:21:51 12/15/16 (4)

RE: yes. paralleled sections causing smear is fictional - PakProtector 03:37:35 01/04/17 (0)

You are incorrect. - drlowmu 06:52:33 12/22/16 (2)

RE: You are incorrect. - zarniwoop 15:04:00 12/23/16 (1)

RE: You are incorrect. - drlowmu 09:24:21 12/24/16 (0)

RE: Smeared? - Tre' 20:17:22 12/12/16 (8)

I would expect it to double? (nt) - gusser 11:50:00 12/13/16 (1)

+1 (nt) - Tre' 18:24:10 12/13/16 (0)

RE: Smeared? - kyle 06:31:45 12/13/16 (5)

RE: Smeared? - Tre' 17:01:16 12/13/16 (4)

RE: Smeared? - kyle 05:31:01 12/14/16 (3)

try 'power' tubes - PakProtector 09:20:29 12/16/16 (2)

RE: try 'power' tubes - kyle 13:39:19 12/16/16 (1)

RE: try 'power' tubes - PakProtector 11:54:09 01/17/17 (0)

RE: Smeared? - SteveBrown 16:03:02 12/12/16 (0)

RE: Is that why SS sounds like crap? - deafbykhorns 15:20:35 12/10/16 (0)

RE: Sonically, its called the " choir effect ". - kyle 08:31:31 12/10/16 (2)

Getting to the "work around" - DAK 09:34:40 12/12/16 (1)

PM sent nt - kyle 11:59:12 12/12/16 (0)

And yet... - Ivan303 08:30:58 12/10/16 (3)

RE: And yet... - used-hifi 12:04:35 12/10/16 (0)

RE: And yet... - kyle 08:35:51 12/10/16 (1)

That said, I likely will not go with parallel 6SL7 to drive my current 300B SET amp... - Ivan303 10:27:10 12/10/16 (0)

RE: as well as entertaining - deafbykhorns 19:18:20 12/09/16 (0)

..Yes also seeking input... - drummerwill 09:32:37 12/08/16 (0)

RE: Using both section of a dual triode for the driver tube - kyle 08:54:30 12/08/16 (15)

RE: Using both section of a dual triode for the driver tube - SteveBrown 02:31:42 12/10/16 (0)

RE: what does double the transconductance do? - DAK 17:49:01 12/08/16 (1)

RE: what does double the transconductance do? - Chip647 05:06:06 12/09/16 (0)

RE: What are the pros and cons? nt - DAK 09:33:35 12/08/16 (11)

RE: What are the pros and cons? nt - kyle 11:23:15 12/08/16 (10)

RE: What are the pros and cons? nt - DAK 11:27:26 12/08/16 (9)

Another answer - Frihed89 14:59:06 12/08/16 (6)

RE: Another answer - DAK 15:48:58 12/08/16 (5)

RE: Another answer - Frihed89 01:02:42 12/09/16 (4)

RE: Another answer - kyle 08:02:31 12/09/16 (3)

This is a reply from the tube DIY Asylum - Frihed89 15:10:26 12/09/16 (1)

Remarkably similar. nt - kyle 17:33:14 12/09/16 (0)

OK. Thanks - Frihed89 12:02:01 12/09/16 (0)

RE: What are the pros and cons? nt - kyle 12:08:23 12/08/16 (1)

RE: That seems pretty good to me - DAK 15:45:32 12/08/16 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: Using both section of a dual triode for the driver tube - kyle 08:54:30 12/08/16 (15)

RE: Using both section of a dual triode for the driver tube - SteveBrown 02:31:42 12/10/16 (0)

RE: what does double the transconductance do? - DAK 17:49:01 12/08/16 (1)

RE: what does double the transconductance do? - Chip647 05:06:06 12/09/16 (0)

RE: What are the pros and cons? nt - DAK 09:33:35 12/08/16 (11)

RE: What are the pros and cons? nt - kyle 11:23:15 12/08/16 (10)

RE: What are the pros and cons? nt - DAK 11:27:26 12/08/16 (9)

Another answer - Frihed89 14:59:06 12/08/16 (6)

RE: Another answer - DAK 15:48:58 12/08/16 (5)

RE: Another answer - Frihed89 01:02:42 12/09/16 (4)

RE: Another answer - kyle 08:02:31 12/09/16 (3)

This is a reply from the tube DIY Asylum - Frihed89 15:10:26 12/09/16 (1)

Remarkably similar. nt - kyle 17:33:14 12/09/16 (0)

OK. Thanks - Frihed89 12:02:01 12/09/16 (0)

RE: What are the pros and cons? nt - kyle 12:08:23 12/08/16 (1)

RE: That seems pretty good to me - DAK 15:45:32 12/08/16 (0)

Post a Message!