Home Propeller Head Plaza

Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.

Semantic evasion likewise.

You're putting forth the test, and without providing a single detail, dismissing everything everyone says to you. So you've taken on responsiblity personally for these ideas, and you can live with it.

Now, you have yet to offer any evidence about subjects having trouble with familiar material. On the converse, there are reams of data showing than unfamiliarity with the entire setup, music, etc, desensitize test.

You claim that there is no problem with running multiple subjects. On the converse, there are reams of data showing:
1) That multiple subjects affect each others' scoring.
2) That an inability to do a clean, fast, listener-controlled switch desensitizes a test.
3) That primary auditory memory starts to fade inside of 200 milliseconds.

How, then, can you run fixed-switched tests that do not allow time-proximate comparison (where "proximate" means 200 milliseconds) and have sensitivity.

You have made some very strong claims, and you won't provide any evidence, yet you whine incessantly when others point this out.

If you want to convince anyone that this test you talk about does anything beyond run a desensitized test that will not get to already-measured JND's you have to do better.

Lots better.

Like I said, submit a paper to the 115th AES on this.
JJ - Philalethist and Annoyer of Bullies


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Amplified Parts  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.