Re: Actually, using control conditions would be better - Adi

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Why wont ABX show a difference? - Jerry Parker 23:31:48 11/27/02 (76)

Re: Thanks for the responses guys! (n/t) - Jerry Parker 20:58:31 11/28/02 (0)

Re: Why wont ABX show a difference? - PabloP 14:54:02 11/28/02 (0)

ALL, and I mean ALL of the reputable evidence shows that you CAN hear in a DBT test - jj 11:23:08 11/28/02 (66)

Re: ALL, and I mean ALL of the reputable evidence shows that you CAN hear in a DBT test - Jitter_by_Coffee 05:01:17 12/01/02 (41)

Look, running multiple subjects who can see, hear, etc, each other - jj 23:33:59 12/01/02 (40)

Re: Look, running multiple subjects who can see, hear, etc, each other - Jitter_by_Coffee 06:26:34 12/02/02 (39)

So, how many subjects do you run, and how many trials per subject? - jj 07:24:32 12/02/02 (38)

Re: So, how many subjects do you run, and how many trials per subject? - Jitter_by_Coffee 17:27:51 12/02/02 (36)

Well, if you run one subject, and they control the switching... - jj 20:59:20 12/02/02 (35)

Re: Well, if you run one subject, and they control the switching... - Jitter_by_Coffee 13:52:28 12/03/02 (34)

Argumentum ad exhaustion is hardly convincing - jj 18:03:27 12/03/02 (33)

Re: Argumentum ad exhaustion is hardly convincing - Jitter_by_Coffee 06:25:59 12/04/02 (32)

It's called "peer review", Jit - E-Stat 18:00:48 12/04/02 (18)

Re: It's called "peer review", Jit - Jitter_by_Coffee 07:54:26 12/05/02 (17)

Here - E-Stat 09:24:36 12/05/02 (16)

And by all means - Jitter_by_Coffee 11:51:38 12/05/02 (10)

Why bother? - E-Stat 16:28:36 12/05/02 (9)

Re: Why bother? - Jitter_by_Coffee 16:59:32 12/05/02 (8)

It is truly a shame that - E-Stat 20:10:33 12/05/02 (7)

Re: It is truly a shame that - Jitter_by_Coffee 11:50:07 12/06/02 (6)

Re: It is truly a shame that - Jitter_by_Coffee 11:52:01 12/06/02 (5)

Indeed opinions play a part - E-Stat 14:20:55 12/06/02 (4)

Re: Indeed opinions play a part - Jitter_by_Coffee 22:37:10 12/06/02 (3)

Let me refresh you memory - E-Stat 07:26:55 12/07/02 (2)

Re: Let me refresh you memory - Jitter_by_Coffee 06:37:48 12/09/02 (1)

Actually, I was at Disney two weeks ago - E-Stat 11:49:06 12/09/02 (0)

Re: Here - Jitter_by_Coffee 11:47:34 12/05/02 (4)

Re: Here - E-Stat 14:41:06 12/05/02 (3)

Re: Here - Jitter_by_Coffee 16:58:50 12/05/02 (2)

They do so on a regular basis - E-Stat 20:07:34 12/05/02 (1)

Re: They do so on a regular basis - Jitter_by_Coffee 11:48:26 12/06/02 (0)

Your point? You want to claim that your methods are effective.... - jj 09:54:30 12/04/02 (12)

Re: Your point? You want to claim that your methods are effective.... - Jitter_by_Coffee 07:51:01 12/05/02 (11)

Semantic evasion likewise. - jj 15:11:53 12/05/02 (10)

Re: Semantic evasion likewise. - Jitter_by_Coffee 17:16:40 12/05/02 (9)

Let's not let the facts bother you, eh? - jj 19:25:02 12/05/02 (8)

Re: Let's not let the facts bother you, eh? - Jitter_by_Coffee 11:46:59 12/06/02 (7)

Stop creating false positions for me. - jj 23:49:17 12/08/02 (6)

Re: Stop creating false positions for me. - Jitter_by_Coffee 06:31:06 12/09/02 (5)

I guess, once again, you can't deal with the facts... - jj 16:38:53 12/09/02 (4)

Re: I guess, once again, you can't deal with the facts... - Jitter_by_Coffee 07:14:00 12/18/02 (3)

It's time for you to retire from this, and admit you have nothing at hand - jj 17:58:41 12/18/02 (2)

Re: It's time for you to retire from this, and admit you have nothing at hand - Jitter_by_Coffee 05:22:44 12/20/02 (1)

See the CFP above - jj 21:00:26 12/26/02 (0)

I'm curious too - E-Stat 15:35:10 12/02/02 (0)

And make sure that the signal is not degraded - E-Stat 19:37:58 11/30/02 (10)

One ALWAYS must test the test... - jj 23:35:41 12/01/02 (9)

I'll answer your question with a question - E-Stat 15:21:03 12/02/02 (3)

How could anyone even know the answer to that? - jj 20:58:02 12/02/02 (2)

Reality is where the rubber hits the road - E-Stat 07:49:09 12/03/02 (1)

Re: Reality is where the rubber hits the road - Adi 09:55:32 12/03/02 (0)

Re: One ALWAYS must test the test... - Adi 14:22:15 12/02/02 (4)

Actually, using control conditions would be better - jj 21:00:10 12/02/02 (3)

Re: Actually, using control conditions would be better - Adi 22:17:46 12/02/02 (2)

You do an ABX test with known controls, Adi... - jj 00:03:32 12/03/02 (1)

Re: You do an ABX test with known controls, Adi... - Adi 05:55:26 12/03/02 (0)

Re: ALL, and I mean ALL of the reputable evidence shows that you CAN hear in a DBT test - Phil Tower 12:09:02 11/28/02 (12)

Err, even some not that splendid ones have shown differences, Phil. - jj 22:42:16 11/28/02 (3)

Re: Err, even some not that splendid ones have shown differences, Phil. - Phil Tower 09:07:38 11/29/02 (2)

I'm not sure where to start.... - jj 23:57:37 12/01/02 (1)

Re: I'm not sure where to start.... - Phil Tower 05:21:09 12/03/02 (0)

Re: ALL, and I mean ALL of the reputable evidence shows that you CAN hear in a DBT test - RGA 19:31:14 11/28/02 (7)

Apparently, you enjoy speculating on the obvious! - E-Stat 19:36:50 11/30/02 (5)

OK - RGA 17:46:28 12/01/02 (4)

Re: OK - middleground 10:26:26 12/17/02 (0)

Not !! - E-Stat 15:27:41 12/02/02 (2)

Re: Not !! - RGA 17:33:29 12/02/02 (1)

Not !! - E-Stat 20:24:49 12/02/02 (0)

I think you answered your own question, yes? - jj 22:43:18 11/28/02 (0)

Re: Why wont ABX show a difference? - john curl 09:59:06 11/28/02 (3)

Just curious how did they test them?? - Robert Hamel 07:30:10 11/29/02 (2)

Re: Just curious how did they test them?? - john curl 10:18:37 11/30/02 (1)

Thanks for where to look.nt. - Robert Hamel 15:54:10 11/30/02 (0)

My take! - Granholm 06:22:32 11/28/02 (2)

Re: My take! - middleground 10:56:17 11/28/02 (1)

Re: My take! - Granholm 12:16:47 11/28/02 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: Actually, using control conditions would be better - Adi 22:17:46 12/02/02 (2)

You do an ABX test with known controls, Adi... - jj 00:03:32 12/03/02 (1)

Re: You do an ABX test with known controls, Adi... - Adi 05:55:26 12/03/02 (0)