In Reply to: Re: So, how many subjects do you run, and how many trials per subject? posted by Jitter_by_Coffee on December 2, 2002 at 17:27:51:
I haven't seen the problem with trained subjects.Period.
So what problem were you trying to address? You keep saying "look outside the box" but I haven't got any evidence that you can show a good detection threshold.
JJ - Philalethist and Annoyer of Bullies
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Well, if you run one subject, and they control the switching... - jj 20:59:20 12/02/02 (35)
- Re: Well, if you run one subject, and they control the switching... - Jitter_by_Coffee 13:52:28 12/03/02 (34)
- Argumentum ad exhaustion is hardly convincing - jj 18:03:27 12/03/02 (33)
- Re: Argumentum ad exhaustion is hardly convincing - Jitter_by_Coffee 06:25:59 12/04/02 (32)
- It's called "peer review", Jit - E-Stat 18:00:48 12/04/02 (18)
- Re: It's called "peer review", Jit - Jitter_by_Coffee 07:54:26 12/05/02 (17)
- Here - E-Stat 09:24:36 12/05/02 (16)
- And by all means - Jitter_by_Coffee 11:51:38 12/05/02 (10)
- Why bother? - E-Stat 16:28:36 12/05/02 (9)
- Re: Why bother? - Jitter_by_Coffee 16:59:32 12/05/02 (8)
- It is truly a shame that - E-Stat 20:10:33 12/05/02 (7)
- Re: It is truly a shame that - Jitter_by_Coffee 11:50:07 12/06/02 (6)
- Re: It is truly a shame that - Jitter_by_Coffee 11:52:01 12/06/02 (5)
- Indeed opinions play a part - E-Stat 14:20:55 12/06/02 (4)
- Re: Indeed opinions play a part - Jitter_by_Coffee 22:37:10 12/06/02 (3)
- Let me refresh you memory - E-Stat 07:26:55 12/07/02 (2)
- Re: Let me refresh you memory - Jitter_by_Coffee 06:37:48 12/09/02 (1)
- Actually, I was at Disney two weeks ago - E-Stat 11:49:06 12/09/02 (0)
- Re: Here - Jitter_by_Coffee 11:47:34 12/05/02 (4)
- Re: Here - E-Stat 14:41:06 12/05/02 (3)
- Re: Here - Jitter_by_Coffee 16:58:50 12/05/02 (2)
- They do so on a regular basis - E-Stat 20:07:34 12/05/02 (1)
- Re: They do so on a regular basis - Jitter_by_Coffee 11:48:26 12/06/02 (0)
- Your point? You want to claim that your methods are effective.... - jj 09:54:30 12/04/02 (12)
- Re: Your point? You want to claim that your methods are effective.... - Jitter_by_Coffee 07:51:01 12/05/02 (11)
- Semantic evasion likewise. - jj 15:11:53 12/05/02 (10)
- Re: Semantic evasion likewise. - Jitter_by_Coffee 17:16:40 12/05/02 (9)
- Let's not let the facts bother you, eh? - jj 19:25:02 12/05/02 (8)
- Re: Let's not let the facts bother you, eh? - Jitter_by_Coffee 11:46:59 12/06/02 (7)
- Stop creating false positions for me. - jj 23:49:17 12/08/02 (6)
- Re: Stop creating false positions for me. - Jitter_by_Coffee 06:31:06 12/09/02 (5)
- I guess, once again, you can't deal with the facts... - jj 16:38:53 12/09/02 (4)
- Re: I guess, once again, you can't deal with the facts... - Jitter_by_Coffee 07:14:00 12/18/02 (3)
- It's time for you to retire from this, and admit you have nothing at hand - jj 17:58:41 12/18/02 (2)
- Re: It's time for you to retire from this, and admit you have nothing at hand - Jitter_by_Coffee 05:22:44 12/20/02 (1)
- See the CFP above - jj 21:00:26 12/26/02 (0)