In Reply to: Re: Read the post BEFORE responding, please... posted by john curl on November 19, 2002 at 12:28:55:
""Now for the rest of you out there. It is true that these levels are low, BUT they are consistent, and change with each type of wire tested. This is real, not guesswork. I am sure that they correlate to subjective listening response to some degree at least, because the 'lousy' wires usually measure much worse than the hi end wires that I have tested.""There, that wan't hard now, was it??
You have no hard data to back it up your assumption that signals that low are audible, but you express an opinion. That's fine.
And I have no issues with your ability to test signals that low in the "mud", re:real vs guesswork.
TTFN, John
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- mud measurements. - John Escallier 13:02:50 11/19/02 (4)
- Re: mud measurements. - john curl 14:52:28 11/19/02 (3)
- "Just ears" - John Escallier 15:14:16 11/19/02 (2)
- Thanks guys, that was interesting. [nt] - dennzio 17:16:55 11/19/02 (1)
- Interesting isn't the word for it.... - John Escallier 17:21:35 11/19/02 (0)