In Reply to: RE: Schumann frequency - Houston, we have a problem! posted by geoffkait on April 27, 2015 at 12:08:39:
You say a bunch of stuff which is either un proven or unprovable.
Than when I point out some real information you call me for 'niggling'.
What ever THAT is, coming from you as an assertion, it can't be good.
You still haven't told me how you KNOW the Schumann resonance frequency hasn't changed, though I'll concede it's been the same since at least the first day of the 20th century.
It seems clear that the Mass of the Earth rises over long time periods. No data exists for the size of the ionosphere over long time periods, even torturing Old Kingdom Egyptian or more recent Myan data.
Too much is never enough
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Schumann frequency - Houston, we have a problem! - pictureguy 14:14:15 04/27/15 (7)
- RE: Schumann frequency - Houston, we have a problem! - geoffkait 14:46:50 04/27/15 (6)
- RE: Schumann frequency - Houston, we have a problem! - pictureguy 18:56:35 04/27/15 (5)
- RE: Schumann frequency - Houston, we have a problem! - geoffkait 03:50:09 04/28/15 (4)
- RE: Schumann frequency - Houston, we have a problem! - pictureguy 20:39:05 04/28/15 (3)
- RE: Schumann frequency - Houston, we have a problem! - geoffkait 02:59:23 04/29/15 (2)
- RE: Schumann frequency - Houston, we have a problem! - pictureguy 10:23:51 04/29/15 (1)
- RE: Schumann frequency - Houston, we have a problem! - geoffkait 11:49:06 04/29/15 (0)