In Reply to: RE: With actual citations in hand... posted by Pat D on October 15, 2010 at 11:52:08:
Well, mtry certainly showed you didn't understand the burden of proof.
and lack of understanding context as demonstrated by both of you. Let's start at the beginning with Mytry's claim found here (where you also posted):
"Yes, you may be right if there was only one test. There isn't. 30 years of testing on any different number of gear, including very expensive cable maker's gear with null results.
Naturally, I asked him to support his claim since THE BURDEN OF PROOF was on him to support his assertion. Do you understand? It was afterwards that he admitted that he has no such citations. Only fig newtons of his equally poor memory. He just makes $hit up that he thinks folks won't try to verify.
Apparently you still don't.
Apparently still don't what? Remember Mtry was unable to back his claim? Remember his citations (like yours) either talk about zip cord back in 1983 or don't give the remotest clue of test conditions?
rw
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- The Power of Poor Memory... - E-Stat 12:26:48 10/15/10 (34)
- Ah, I see, a "tu quoque" argument. - Pat D 14:03:42 10/15/10 (33)
- Wrong again - E-Stat 14:31:15 10/15/10 (29)
- Since you resist the point below, let's analyze. - Pat D 19:36:56 10/16/10 (11)
- I'm not going to dissect this next journey into confusion - E-Stat 06:37:05 10/17/10 (6)
- You keep changing your ground. - Pat D 05:03:15 10/18/10 (5)
- You need to read again what I said - E-Stat 06:18:56 10/18/10 (4)
- Changing your ground again. - Pat D 07:22:14 10/18/10 (3)
- Evidence? - Tony Lauck 07:50:25 10/18/10 (0)
- Your memory fails you again - E-Stat 07:33:22 10/18/10 (1)
- RE: Your memory fails you again - Pat D 10:23:28 10/19/10 (0)
- Please fix your references. - Tony Lauck 21:13:41 10/16/10 (3)
- The URL works for me. - Pat D 04:53:10 10/18/10 (1)
- Thank you. - Tony Lauck 06:46:09 10/18/10 (0)
- There is no reference to BassNut's test - E-Stat 06:31:11 10/17/10 (0)
- So how does this show cables sound different? (nt) - Pat D 15:20:44 10/15/10 (16)
- It doesn't - E-Stat 15:39:35 10/15/10 (15)
- I know. - Pat D 18:10:36 10/15/10 (14)
- RE: I know. - josh358 14:38:45 10/16/10 (4)
- RE: I know. - Pat D 19:52:33 10/16/10 (3)
- RE: I know. - josh358 20:27:09 10/16/10 (2)
- RE: I know. - Pat D 05:16:33 10/18/10 (1)
- RE: I know. - josh358 09:11:02 10/19/10 (0)
- You know what? - E-Stat 20:40:37 10/15/10 (8)
- It would help if you actually read that old thread at AR. - Pat D 19:44:30 10/16/10 (7)
- That is exactly what I would say to you! - E-Stat 06:29:13 10/17/10 (6)
- Why do persist in propagating falsehoods? - Pat D 04:44:15 10/18/10 (0)
- You're not getting it! - kerr 08:21:59 10/17/10 (4)
- RE: You're not getting it! - Pat D 05:21:16 10/18/10 (1)
- RE: You're not getting it! - kerr 09:41:53 10/18/10 (0)
- Such just boggles the mind -nt - E-Stat 09:00:16 10/17/10 (1)
- I don't think that's true - kerr 09:48:30 10/17/10 (0)
- Geez.... When people say that the only thing that's worse ... - carcass93 14:19:03 10/15/10 (2)
- As usual, you have nothing to add beyond name calling. - Pat D 14:25:19 10/15/10 (1)
- You, with each of your posts, just YEARN to be called names. - carcass93 14:30:36 10/15/10 (0)