|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
|
|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
In Reply to: A Suggestion Why Some Observations Cannot be Scientifically Verified posted by John C. - Aussie on November 14, 2002 at 14:08:04:
##However, as with mathematical proof, the validity of an argument depends upon the initial postulates and herein lies the tank trap in audio argument. Scientifically one should only accept postulates supported by scientific method before advancing further argument. However many arguments are based upon subjective, not objective analysis. To those who support the scientific method this is unacceptable as, from that viewpoint, further discussion is invalid as it is based on, to them, unproven assumptions.##Absolutely. The problem I see here w/r to skin effect, is that since it has not ben clearly defined and tested (peer review verified), any further analysis is based on a house of cards.
Tank trap? either tubes, or WW2.
Why don't you, I, John Curl, and Jon Risch get into a heated debate over it? That way, I'll have no clue as to who said what?
TTFN, John
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: A Suggestion Why Some Observations Cannot be Scientifically Verified - John Escallier 15:16:30 11/14/02 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
