|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
|
|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
In Reply to: I believe it is the tests that are flawed, not the equipment posted by E-Stat on November 13, 2002 at 14:47:59:
Which is why I disagree with rcrump about the validity of DBTs. You have to figure out how to corelate what we hear, with what we can measure if you are to get realiable repeatable results. DBT's are also important in dcided what is important to measure, and what isn't."Yessiree, we can measure tones right on down to the basement! For those individuals who enjoy listening to test tones, then the audible results would likely correlate with the measurements. Fine."
You also have to understand that the simpler a test the better(Good ol' worn out KISS). The trick coming up with the right surrogate test signal to achieve the desired results. It is quite possible to make a test signal so complex that a room full of Cray computers can't properly analyse it. So what good is that?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: I believe it is the tests that are flawed, not the equipment - Jitter_by_Coffee 20:38:26 11/13/02 (3)
- Therein lies the challenge - E-Stat 03:50:55 11/14/02 (2)
- Re: Therein lies the challenge - Jitter_by_Coffee 08:58:01 11/14/02 (1)
- We certainly agree here - E-Stat 13:44:27 11/14/02 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]